Mandag den 2. august 2010 12:28:32 skrev Cornelius Schumacher:
Could you define "poweruser", so we are all on the same page when talking about it?
When I first wrote it, I was thinking along the lines of this categorization which is used in the openSUSE surveys: "Experienced user without technical skills: you do updates and configure your computer as you like it" 96.8% of the respondents in the survey were in this category "or better" btw. ( http://old-en.opensuse.org/images/3/3a/SurveySummary_03012010.pdf , pg. 2) I also explicitly added to the proposal that you don't have to be a developer or a sysadmin to be considered a poweruser, but nevertheless the word "poweruser" seems to give the wrong impressions. So I think it would be better if everybody just forgot about the word "poweruser", and rename my proposal :-) From: "openSUSE - For the productive poweruser" To: "openSUSE - The powerful, professional, productive community Linux-distro" I think that conveys the message I originally intended better :-/
== Activities ==
The proposal doesn't list the build service or anything else, which is not directly part of the distribution. What would be the place of this infrastructure, community, etc. in this strategy?
I think everything begins and ends with the distro. OBS and Studio etc. are "just" means to the end. But I think they fit well in this strategy - since they're very powerful, professional and productive tools :-) Maybe part of the "problem" is that we're trying to define our goals (what to do) _and_ strategy (how to do it) in one go. Maybe I tend to focus more on creating a mission statement and identity for the project - and not so much on how to actually carry out the mission. -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-project+unsubscribe@opensuse.org For additional commands, e-mail: opensuse-project+help@opensuse.org