On Friday, 5 May 2017 18:02 Jim Henderson wrote:
On Thu, 04 May 2017 07:23:33 +0200, Michal Kubecek wrote:
Because the way you wrote it, it sounds as if Richard Brown's taste was more important than technical objections. And that would be very disturbing.
He framed it as a "personal opinion", not as an "official position". I think he was very clear that he was expressing himself as an individual, not as the chair of the board.
My problem with that e-mail is that Richard essentially said he had no technical objection, only the proposal wasn't to his taste. And then, without any explanation or further arguments, he says "we are not going to do it". So it sounds like either there is some big part missing or not being to Richard's taste is the reason for not doing it. Honestly, I don't really like version numbers like 150, and even less so if they are artificial and do not actually mean version 150. But the "leap back" board insists on is worse by an order of magnitude, that is not about taste, it's about elementary logic and breaking people's use cases. Being laughed upon is the smallest problem here. Michal Kubeček -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-project+unsubscribe@opensuse.org To contact the owner, email: opensuse-project+owner@opensuse.org