Am Montag, 20. Juli 2015, 10:17:33 schrieb Douglas DeMaio:
On 07/18/2015 05:14 AM, Jim Henderson wrote:
On Sat, 18 Jul 2015 01:00:17 +0200, Jay wrote:
That it might. The trick with "up-to-date" (or whatever synonym is used) is that it needs to be clear that while it's got current software, it's not necessarily "bleeding-edge" current software.
True. The right wording is important. But there would be accompanying info. And I think those seeking bleeding-edge-experience don't belong to the target group. So disappointing one ore two of them wouldn't be so bad.
Agreed. But it helps us to make sure the wording limits the field of disappointed users to a handful rather than a segment who thought that "up-to-date" meant "bleeding edge". I'm guessing you won't disagree with that. :)
So while it was incredibly stable, it was too inflexible for my needs.
I guess you'll be one of the first to leap to Leap! ;)
It depends on whether my testing shows that the directory server I run on it will run (it's eDirectory - my background, and while the products I work on in my day job doesn't "officially" support it, it's an LDAP server, and the products I work with do support generic LDAP). I don't care if Micro Focus officially supports the config, but if it won't run, I won't be able to use it (that Leap is based on SLE gives it a better chance of running, though, I think) - so it is entirely possible.
But that's also a different discussion. :)
Jim
I would say most of why you all have been describing about Leap is its synergy. I would suggest something like "Leap - Synergies of Community & Enterprise". Community implies up-to-date and Enterprise conveys stable.
In that case Debian would be 100% "up-to-date" and 0% stable. Hm... Rainer Fiebig -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-project+unsubscribe@opensuse.org To contact the owner, email: opensuse-project+owner@opensuse.org