On Tue, 2012-03-27 at 21:22 +0000, Jim Henderson wrote:
On Tue, 27 Mar 2012 14:25:56 -0500, Bryen M Yunashko wrote:
Furthermore, if we are going to use voting as the litmus test, then I would argue we would have to institute that policy "as of now" meaning past non-votes don't count. It wouldn't be fair to "penalize" someone for an action that wasn't considered a penalty before now. If that's the case, then we can't inactivate someone until 2 elections from now.
I'd agree with that, but also that the voting process then *must* include an option to explicitly decline to vote. Otherwise, you're forcing people to vote in order to maintain their membership - even if there's nobody/nothing on the ballot that they could, in good conscience, vote for.
Jim
-- Jim Henderson Please keep on-topic replies on the list so everyone benefits
Yes, it all has to be part of this "reboot." But the main gist of what I'm pointing out is that if we are going this route, our delay is going to be about 2 years from now before we start inactivating anyone and I think that kind of defies the whole intent in the first place. Bryen -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-project+unsubscribe@opensuse.org To contact the owner, email: opensuse-project+owner@opensuse.org