5. Board gives statement to fulfill both need for transparency and to protect former board members at best possibly.
If that was the real intention behind the board statement then you guys failed miserably. Making accusations of bad and multiple violations of the Code of Conduct and Guiding Principles by Sarah without giving any context or details is the absolute opposite of protecting the former and resigned board members. The statement hardly protected anyone else but the misbehaving board members who violated the Code of Conduct in the process of the events mentioned. This is and never was about protecting the Code of Conduct or the former board members, if you ask me. And as we can see I am not alone with that point of view.
And I can't blame either of the two board ex-members for changing their mind eventually and starting to defend themselves.
You're linking their defending to a statement of the board that happened *after* the former board members started defending themselves. So, again, please keep the events in order.
I can't see where the order of events has any relevance for Michal's argument. If so it rather supports Michals point than your as it is obvious that parts of the statement decided the former members to start defending themselves instead of staying silent or at least vague. -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-project+unsubscribe@opensuse.org To contact the owner, email: opensuse-project+owner@opensuse.org