On Monday 22 January 2007 21:41, Thomas Hertweck wrote:
I disagree with you and fully agree with Martin's opinion quoted above. SLED is not an alternative to openSUSE.
No, SLED is not an alternative, it's a product on its own and one of its main goals is stability. It has a much more appropriate mojo to provide that compared to openSUSE. Yeah it would be so fabulous if openSUSE would be stable and polished, have super new software and nice glitz, but it's damned *HARD* to achieve, technically and financially. SLED has the stability and polish, and reasonably new software. openSUSE has to be the "playground and test bed for freaks". This advances the distro.
But forcing everybody
What forcing? Hello! Who forced you?
You should realize that openSUSE is not a playground and test bed for freaks but used on many production systems, for instance in small and mid-sized companies, or even at home - those installations are actually used for work and have to function!
Then, wrong product in the wrong place. If you want stability for production, SLED is the right thing to run. I bet you would hesitate recommending "Windows XP Home" instead of full XP to any small company, so why do you have such a problem with SLED? --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-project+unsubscribe@opensuse.org For additional commands, e-mail: opensuse-project+help@opensuse.org