On Fri, 11 Apr 2014 23:12:10 +0200, jdd wrote:
Le 11/04/2014 21:30, Caig a écrit :
There will be always the "lazy" users,
but a more user-oriented* wiki
could be useful at least for the rest
I think it's the way choosen some time (years?) ago, and it's a wrong
wiki are searched by google or it's own search engine, and admins have
to focus on this.
then wiki are *written* by volunteers that can't know the desired
structure and shouldn't have to worry about. I stopped writing on the
wiki when it became necessary to organize it.
"wiki organization" is contradictory by essence. just now the forum
archives do the job of the wiki.
It's perfectly nice to have a *documentation* web site, different from
the wiki and well organized, but this have to be done by a documentation
staff, not by random user - I think something similar is on the way for
I somewhat agree and somewhat disagree.
I've always thought that a wiki could be structured, but the structuring
needs to be handled by a dedicated team, with the content provided by
But the volunteers need to have some input into the structure, too.
There's a strong need for a "team" to write like this.
Structure, though, is a high-level idea in a structured wiki. I've seen
them successfully implemented using twiki, for example, and I think
something like that could work for us here. The Povray project uses a
structured wiki for its documentation, in fact (they use Mediawiki - I
initially helped them set it up for that purpose). There are some
special tags they use so the wiki forms the basis for a single-sourced
It actually works pretty well.
Please keep on-topic replies on the list so everyone benefits
To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-project+unsubscribe(a)opensuse.org
To contact the owner, email: opensuse-project+owner(a)opensuse.org