"Carlos E. R." <carlos.e.r@opensuse.org> wrote:
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1
On 2012-02-11 09:23, Wolfgang Rosenauer wrote:
Am 11.02.2012 05:47, schrieb Carlos E. R.:
That's a very good point.
It is (in a perfect world). In our current state I still don't think it makes sense to do it that way because it means that the earliest next Evergreen release would be 12.2 and I'm scared to commit to something I don't even know yet.
I think that a practical decision point could be a month or two after the initial release, when it can be seen that it is a good one or a problematic one to skip.
Users that are careful about which version to install usually defer to that point (or later), so that if they also know which version is going to have an extended maintenance, the decision is easier. For both sides :-)
I know it can not be decided in advance :-)
You think so? Why Not choose 12.2 for LTS and ship only stable Software and minor changes? 12.1 got systemd and GNOME 3, now a polished, conservative release would Fit as llong Term supported. Thanks, --kdl -- Send from my smartphone via K9 Mail -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-project+unsubscribe@opensuse.org To contact the owner, email: opensuse-project+owner@opensuse.org