On 4/16/24 3:47 PM, Richard Brown wrote:
[...] So I wanted to put an option b) on the table even if I don't like it. > I feel if I didn't propose at least two paths forward people would accuse me of not being constructive, being too demanding, being unfair, being unwilling to compromise, or some other colourful variation.
Ok. Your position is clear to me now. Thanks. But if you would accept some criticism, I would say your way of putting b) on the table initially was a bit harsher than actually needed. You didn't put it on the table, you thrown it on some people's toes. ;-)
[...]
Does that clear things up?
I think so. I don't necessarily agree with b) been a reasonably alternative to a), but I understand your rationale now. Cheers. -- Ancor González Sosa YaST Team at SUSE Software Solutions