El dc 05 de 03 del 2008 a les 12:59 +0100, en/na jdd va escriure:
Michael Loeffler a écrit :
Yes, just the chairmam should be appointed by Novell. Everybody else should vote for anybody.
anybody should be allowed to vote, but not for anybody.
Let's show an example. say the ten first choices after the vote are non Novell.
choices 1 and 2 are elected. but then you have to look at the 11th on the list (novell)?
And what mean Novell? does that mean "presented by Novell on a list", or only apponted by Novell?
what if he's only the Novells house keeper?
what if resign from Novell two month after? what if he's fired by Novell?
what if the board member is _employed_ by Novell after hes election?
That is a good point. But that can happens whether we voted or not for them. I mean, should we not vote to the board members just in case they get an employment in Novell? If any of the two happens, they should leave their sit. But to whom? Or should it be empty? Being empty would be a very bad situation. Actually what it is really very bad is this restriction of being two Novell and two not Novell (we already have a Novell chairman that can decide anything).
No. Th only clean way is to have Novell choose (and renew is fired or dismiss) they members and all the community choose the (2) others
jdd
-- Jordi Massaguer i Pla openTrends Solucions i Sistemes, S.L. Torre Llacuna C/Llacuna 166, 10º 1ª A 08018 Barcelona Phone: (+34) 93 320 84 14 Fax: (+34) 93 300 35 27 --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-project+unsubscribe@opensuse.org For additional commands, e-mail: opensuse-project+help@opensuse.org