![](https://seccdn.libravatar.org/avatar/6435c3e8843adf6ba683f32a7aea0e0e.jpg?s=120&d=mm&r=g)
Worry not, we can make sure we steer away from backpressure nonsense with simple steps: 1. you take a look at https://en.opensuse.org/openSUSE:Documentation_migration. 2. you share all the *understanding questions* you still have and the folks from the docs try to address them until there is none left (and I am happy to do my best to address them here). 3. we proceed to *objections*, but since objections are essentially about a team effort, you'll have to share them in a context more hospitable to a debate, where pieces of the context are tightly fitted against each other, so that everyone can appreciate the bigger picture without too much cognitive overload or surrounding noise. That is either the page linked above (section "Discussion"), or the docs ML (because it's more focussed than this one), or our GitHub repository. It's a simple deal: you take the deal, you get answers, you don't take the deal, you don't get answers. You can take it, or you can leave it. That's as much arrogance as I am capable of. Le 08/08/2021 à 18:29, Per Jessen a écrit :
Vojtěch Zeisek wrote:
Dne neděle 8. srpna 2021 14:36:11 CEST, Richard Brown napsal(a):
Now I’ll need to fork, make my changes, probably argue with some self appointed reviewers who claim to know better about what is supported despite the fact I’m the one supporting it… Yeah; the more I think about these revamped docs the more insane this whole endeavour seems to be, especially given the total lack of engagement to date with the folk actually in a position of influence on what is “official” and therefore what should be in a curated “official” documentation.
I think the move can bring plenty of benefits. I agree that doing especially small changes is much faster on wiki. I'd say whole thing could be better discussed from beginning. On the other hand, it's perfect example of openSUSE "do-cracy" - group of active volunteers started to improve one of openSUSE long-lasting issues, which is positive. :-)
I have to wonder if it isn't one of the worst examples of what our "do-ocracy" can lead to. Riding roughshod over the wiki users and authors' community is not a best practice.
I also think sensible criticism should be accepted and discussed instead of just arrogantly dismissed as "backpressure nonsense".