28 Mar
2003
28 Mar
'03
10:22
On Friday 28 March 2003 04:31 am, Mads Martin Jorgensen wrote:
* Steven T. Hatton
[Mar 28. 2003 10:27]: No need. The code is almost identical you yours. The Part I didn't know to do whas "std::". And the "endl" seems to be a thing of the past as well.
std::endl still works fine. You gcc have just become more anal with the namespaces.
-- Mads Martin Joergensen, http://mmj.dk
I'm still confused about documentation. What documentation covers the standard C++ libraries in gcc? STH