7 Apr
2003
7 Apr
'03
14:30
Peter Osterlund wrote: [SNIP]
The loop driver is doing the same thing. Is there a reason to behave differently than the loop driver in this case?
I have uploaded a new patch with the minor changes I have made so far:
http://w1.894.telia.com/~u89404340/patches/packet/2.5/packet-2.5.66-2.patch....
Peter, It might be a good idea to convert the kdevname() function calls to something more appropriate now, since it has been removed in 2.5.66-bk current. See the " [PATCH] remove kdevname() before someone starts using it again" thread on the LKML for more info on this subject and discussions of possible replacement functions. Cheers, Nicholas