2010/12/7 Petr Gajdos
Hi list,
I would like to hear your opinion about future jpeg packaging. I am asked to switch back to jpeg6 in Factory.
Nowadays we have following packages in graphics project: * libjpeg6 (contains only library) * libjpeg7 (contains only library) * jpeg (contains doc files and bin tools) -> libjpeg8 (contains library) -> libjpeg-devel (contains *.h and *.so)
I should do full-fledged jpeg 6 package as jpeg (8) is and we should have it in parallel if I understend correctly (not sure about jpeg 7 package).
jpeg 7 only existed for 6 months, I don't think there is any use for it. But we are already testing this... 11.3 hasn't a libjpeg7 packages, was any bug report created asking for it?
I would appreciate any advice, here is a first thought proposal:
* jpeg6 (contains doc files and bin tools) provides: jpeg, obsoletes: jpeg, conflicts: jpeg8 -> libjpeg6 (contains library) -> libjpeg6-devel (contains development files) provides: jpeg-devel, obsoletes: jpeg-devel, conflicts: jpeg8-devel
* jpeg8 (contains doc files and bin tools) conflicts: jpeg6 -> libjpeg8 (contains library) -> libjpeg8-devel (contains development files) conflicts: jpeg6-devel
Requires should stay same modulo major version.
jpeg6 should be compiled from libjpeg-turbo. But it seems OK to me. -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-packaging+unsubscribe@opensuse.org For additional commands, e-mail: opensuse-packaging+help@opensuse.org