On Tuesday 22 May 2007 16:41:46 wrote Stanislav Brabec:
Adrian Schröter wrote:
On Tuesday 22 May 2007 16:24:32 wrote Stanislav Brabec:
Here is a new version:
- Fixed Requires x BuildRequires confusion. - Support for "this new name is already used in this repository" (by using "%if %suse_version foo || 0%{?opensuse_bs}") - Support for fixes of "has choice for".
AFAIK, with exception of Requires auto-editing and adding of % debug_package, everything else is already supported outside spec files in the BS config, so I plan to drop these functions soon and keep only Requires editing.
JFYI, the old package name should remain to work to avoid %if deserts in spec files.
It fixes only half of my problem - if package requires old name, but there is only new one. It does not fix the case, it package requires new name.
If I mirror only part of packages from Factory to GNOME:UNSTABLE BS, I have no package providing libopenssl-devel. It can be fixed in BuildRequires by BS config, but it cannot be fixed in Requires - nothing in OpenSUSE 10.2 provides libopenssl-devel.
right, did you tried to change the config as Andreas describe you before ? If you have problems right now to access the config, we should fix this instead of running any script hacks (you can also use directly source links afterwards, so you do not need to duplicate the source and two checkin twice). I can also change the config for any project, if you have trouble right now to do this. bye adrian -- Adrian Schroeter SUSE LINUX Products GmbH, GF: Markus Rex, HRB 16746 (AG N�rnberg) email: adrian@suse.de --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-packaging+unsubscribe@opensuse.org For additional commands, e-mail: opensuse-packaging+help@opensuse.org