On 10/4/18 11:11 AM, Alberto Planas Dominguez wrote:
On Thursday, October 4, 2018 5:03:46 PM CEST Michael Ströder wrote:
On 10/4/18 4:52 PM, Alberto Planas Dominguez wrote:
I created an small shim that replace the python3.7 binary to enable this cache prefix feature, to point it to /var/ cache/pycache/<username>, and I removed from the image all the python compiled code.
The above sounds to me that compiled code goes into several user-specific pycache directories. How does that save space?
In two ways basically
* The rpm is smaller
But this is a new requirement? Does the size of the rpm really matter? Previously the focus was on image size, i.e. the size of the result after unpacking all the rpms that go into an image. How does rpm size come into play? Thanks, Robert -- Robert Schweikert MAY THE SOURCE BE WITH YOU Distinguished Architect LINUX Team Lead Public Cloud rjschwei@suse.com IRC: robjo