Hi, On Mon, 3 Sep 2018, Petr Tesarik wrote:
You still can mention them in the factory changes. Sometimes I bring over the .changes entry verbatim from the respective SLE package into the factory one (just the entry, not the patches themself of course), sometimes I create a new .changes entry ala: "- also fixes bnc#....".
That's the approach that failed here: https://build.opensuse.org/request/show/632515
Dominique Leuenberger Request got declined about 4 hours ago
auto-submitted, and obviously not correct: changelog talks of a lot of syncup with SLE and new pacthes - but those patches do not show up
Perhaps because the submit was done by a non-human Dominique was more cautious? Or because there was just some mis-reading in your changelog: +- Merge SLE12 changelog. +- Patches that were never actually applied to Factory: + * makedumpfile-x86_64-xen-vtop.patch (included in 1.6.2) + * makedumpfile-Fix-elf_info-file_size-if-segment-excluded.patch + (included in 1.6.2) It would be more obvious that the non-existing patches are non-existing because they are already included in the factory state if you've said something along the lines of "Patches from SLE12 that are obsolete in this version: <list>". Sure your "(included in") say this already, but misreadings happen ... Ciao, Michael. -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-packaging+unsubscribe@opensuse.org To contact the owner, e-mail: opensuse-packaging+owner@opensuse.org