Am 24.05.2012 13:06, schrieb Richard Guenther:
On Thu, 24 May 2012, Stefan Seyfried wrote:
seriously, this is crazy. Can't we just have libgcj-devel provide a libgcj.jar symlink to the latest libgcj-xx.nar?
Why would the makefile want to know the libgcj.jar file anyway?
Don't ask me. Grepping for LIBGCJ gives: java/Makefile:export GCJFLAGS+= --encoding=UTF-8 --classpath="$(LIBGCJ):$(JAVALIBPATH):." java/Makefile:export GCJHFLAGS+= --classpath="$(LIBGCJ):$(JAVALIBPATH):." And if LIBGCJ is not set to the libgcj.jar, then the beast does not build.
There is, btw, a proper symlink in the java-jdk-gcj-compat package (or whatever that is named again ...).
It seems to be named java-1_5_0-gcj-compat, but as the pdftk is actually only usable with gcj and not with java, i'll probably have to hack it again to find (and use) rt.jar instead of libgcj.jar... Isn't the libgcj the equivalent for java what libc.so.6 is for C code? We have a /lib64/libc.so.6 symlink so why can't we have a libgcj.jar symlink? -- Stefan Seyfried "Dispatch war rocket Ajax to bring back his body!" -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-packaging+unsubscribe@opensuse.org To contact the owner, e-mail: opensuse-packaging+owner@opensuse.org