![](https://seccdn.libravatar.org/avatar/835a9492d596a5f4a8eba92c90ac373b.jpg?s=120&d=mm&r=g)
On Tue, 3 Apr 2007, Dirk Mueller wrote:
On Tuesday, 3. April 2007, Richard Guenther wrote:
proposed library packaging policy are followed. It's non-fatal right now as nearly every package fails it :P
It is wrong, too. it shouldn't reject non-symlink .so files, or .so files pointing to modules.
It's probably too strict, but I'd have to find a better location than the filelist check for a better structured verification. Maybe a rpmlint check is better for now. Richard. -- Richard Guenther <rguenther@suse.de> Novell / SUSE Labs SUSE LINUX Products GmbH - Nuernberg - AG Nuernberg - HRB 16746 - GF: Markus Rex --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-packaging+unsubscribe@opensuse.org For additional commands, e-mail: opensuse-packaging+help@opensuse.org