Hello, on Montag, 31. Januar 2011, Stephan Kulow wrote:
There are tons of packages either failing to build or have unsubmitted changes in their devel projects or (even worse) have submits pending to their devel projects.
I'm a bit surprised to see "Different sources in devel project" for patch2mail... The difference [1] is "only" the SUSE specfile header comment which was (automatically?) inserted when I submitted patch2mail to factory. Since I did not sign any copyright asssignment to SUSE LINUX Products GmbH, I will not take this header into the devel project to get the specfile in sync. You'll have to live with the difference ;-) OTOH, I propose not to sue you[2] for claiming copyright on a specfile you[2] never wrote ;-) That might sound like nitpicking (maybe it even is *g*), so let me summarize the points I have: - patch2mail is probably not the only package that has this header as only difference in the devel project (= false alarms) - please reconsider if this header makes sense nowadays. Given the fact that several packages are completely maintained by community members not employed by Novell/SUSE, I somehow doubt... (I know this might have to do with legal stuff, therefore CC'ing jw) Regards, Christian Boltz [1] https://build.opensuse.org/stage/package/rdiff?opackage=patch2mail&oproject=... [2] "you" as in "SUSE LINUX Products GmbH" -- [makeSUSEdvd] When it works, I will most likely hold a press conference or something, so people will be informed by CNN. :-) [houghi in opensuse] -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-packaging+unsubscribe@opensuse.org For additional commands, e-mail: opensuse-packaging+help@opensuse.org