RE: [opensuse-optimize] How about x86_64?
Ok first step, summarize the work: 1. build the SUPER rpm for x86_64 2. test and install it on beta4 3. build cd image 4. benchmark Right? -----Original Message----- From: Andreas Girardet [mailto:agirardet@novell.com] Sent: martedì 30 agosto 2005 21.55 To: opensuse-optimize@opensuse.org Subject: RE: [opensuse-optimize] How about x86_64?
On Wed, Aug 31, 2005 at 1:45 am, in message <2C8305E0BE090E47A2BAD52A48AC911D04711C51@exchange1.lloyd.com>, ALFANOG@lloydadriatico.it wrote: Ok, I hope to have time this week to read and set up everything. Of course I will ask a lot of stupid question ;)
Ciao Don't worry .... Stupid is my middle name ;) Andreas --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-optimize-unsubscribe@opensuse.org For additional commands, e-mail: opensuse-optimize-help@opensuse.org
On Wed, Aug 31, 2005 at 10:35 pm, in message <2C8305E0BE090E47A2BAD52A48AC911D04712203@exchange1.lloyd.com>, ALFANOG@lloydadriatico.it wrote: Ok first step, summarize the work:
1. build the SUPER rpm for x86_64
The only difference to the normal rpm's is that ours are compiled mtune=i686. And honestly right now I am even thinking the difference is not that great to justify such a step. We probably should roll only rpm's where we actually do genuinely make a difference, the xorg rpm for instance or any other where we modify something (like prelink). I have seen most increases there without having to roll out dozens of other rpm's. And then there are already x86_64 compiled rpm's in existence .... the ones we would compile would virtually not make nay difference. We just introduce a probability of incompatibility/bugs.
2. test and install it on beta4 3. build cd image
That is really the only step really required.
4. benchmark
And that one ;) Anyhow .. what are your thoughts? Andreas
participants (2)
-
ALFANO GIULIO
-
Andreas Girardet