Hi, Ran into an interesting "issue" (quotes, because I'm not sure what to expect and absolutely possible that I'm pulling an armature hour type deal) with Kubic. After starting my test cluster at home I noticed that `kured` pods are on ImagePullBackOff and checking registry-o-o the requested version (1.6.1) in the manifest is missing for amd64. My question: - updates of pods should happen via transactional-updates (as it seems to be a package in /usr/share/k8s-yaml/ that holds these manifests) - or kubicctl should do this (I think kubicctl should only handle the k8s upgrades in the cluster with `salt`, I can be wrong) - or it is the users responsibility to keep the pods up-to-date in their preferred manner? Have the feeling that the last option is the winner, but would feel a lot better if someone would clarify this. -- Br, A.