[opensuse-kernel] openSUSE 12.3 kernel
Hi, Are you aiming for 3.8 or will we stick with 3.7.X? Next week I want to release Beta1 and it should have the correct code line for the kernel. If your choice is 3.8, then we should go to RC2 IMO. Greetings, Stephan -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-kernel+unsubscribe@opensuse.org To contact the owner, e-mail: opensuse-kernel+owner@opensuse.org
On 08.01.2013 13:48, Stephan Kulow wrote:
Hi,
Are you aiming for 3.8 or will we stick with 3.7.X? Next week I want to release Beta1 and it should have the correct code line for the kernel. If your choice is 3.8, then we should go to RC2 IMO.
Ah, one other thing Bernhard brought up: what are the chances of having a recent overlayfs merged into our kernel? Greetings, Stephan -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-kernel+unsubscribe@opensuse.org To contact the owner, e-mail: opensuse-kernel+owner@opensuse.org
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On 1/8/13 9:11 AM, Stephan Kulow wrote:
On 08.01.2013 13:48, Stephan Kulow wrote:
Hi,
Are you aiming for 3.8 or will we stick with 3.7.X? Next week I want to release Beta1 and it should have the correct code line for the kernel. If your choice is 3.8, then we should go to RC2 IMO.
Ah, one other thing Bernhard brought up: what are the chances of having a recent overlayfs merged into our kernel?
Miklos - What's your opinion here? - -Jeff - -- Jeff Mahoney SUSE Labs -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG/MacGPG2 v2.0.18 (Darwin) Comment: GPGTools - http://gpgtools.org Comment: Using GnuPG with undefined - http://www.enigmail.net/ iQIcBAEBAgAGBQJQ7E4eAAoJEB57S2MheeWyOAYP/R9mVw7etsIQNEgDHwn3EIYr boysjmkCIbfsSD3Dxk7Mes26nc4+Xn7yEwuGmPhpJHf7uTg3TZcvK313+lMNueA2 Vf9+kPvgvifCMwiZQ8HYRXKGdZeuv3B4y/syCAzaSJ111VGx5s5F9H6MAzOQRv0K xPwPt/rtYdKw+glH17ikJ4X56lo8MHXy07aD7C8pGRBZfGmzIBJahXw6XR2orsis VyYG7r/UOVJukecB6sWJow/WKx2dJ/dODtv8bREzMNMPwCJEX3fCW+x6/2WhQ1Tg 8O+oyMX0pUIJJjrjmo4poCDuWVc+dGufjGVsEYT6cEHwj292+WyuPFJlM8vzgpfL 97hj9D/Po8HZjt5FNQe7OujVqnY35HJ9amNsmeN0NvHEyvFHNQLOPYkJr5TciBt9 BiH0xD7gNfWmWDqlIQCvlten6dI8/t0Dy+ognpTyILPz94dhvF24eFq1tVjwG7Xx rtgwiXtdRymXEgnpBsOiMEq18SefegYQ8L3XuNGCpqGZODLQWVttuRMzozeGyeoH u4Rq7L7dKEQCzp5QBe+jf6KvzDdH2WMumvbc24mPifcZYpFxqvr4CjCxZk8EIErw 5LVP7z8UXCT6BGE2r6TXX6zQOhDML52Bsxu9R3mZQLa/62jYnnCI2euhF41R62eY PjP44bXvujcWoafAeSrA =HaBn -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-kernel+unsubscribe@opensuse.org To contact the owner, e-mail: opensuse-kernel+owner@opensuse.org
On Tue, 2013-01-08 at 11:49 -0500, Jeff Mahoney wrote:
On 1/8/13 9:11 AM, Stephan Kulow wrote:
On 08.01.2013 13:48, Stephan Kulow wrote:
Hi,
Are you aiming for 3.8 or will we stick with 3.7.X? Next week I want to release Beta1 and it should have the correct code line for the kernel. If your choice is 3.8, then we should go to RC2 IMO.
Ah, one other thing Bernhard brought up: what are the chances of having a recent overlayfs merged into our kernel?
Miklos -
What's your opinion here?
I see no problem with either 3.7 or 3.8 in this respect, the latest overlayfs (which is in factory) applies without major problems to either one. Thanks, Miklos -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-kernel+unsubscribe@opensuse.org To contact the owner, e-mail: opensuse-kernel+owner@opensuse.org
On 09.01.2013 14:49, Miklos Szeredi wrote:
On Tue, 2013-01-08 at 11:49 -0500, Jeff Mahoney wrote:
On 1/8/13 9:11 AM, Stephan Kulow wrote:
On 08.01.2013 13:48, Stephan Kulow wrote:
Hi,
Are you aiming for 3.8 or will we stick with 3.7.X? Next week I want to release Beta1 and it should have the correct code line for the kernel. If your choice is 3.8, then we should go to RC2 IMO.
Ah, one other thing Bernhard brought up: what are the chances of having a recent overlayfs merged into our kernel?
Miklos -
What's your opinion here?
I see no problem with either 3.7 or 3.8 in this respect, the latest overlayfs (which is in factory) applies without major problems to either one.
What does it mean "is in factory" here? I don't have such module Greetings, Stephan -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-kernel+unsubscribe@opensuse.org To contact the owner, e-mail: opensuse-kernel+owner@opensuse.org
On Wed, 2013-01-09 at 14:51 +0100, Stephan Kulow wrote:
On 09.01.2013 14:49, Miklos Szeredi wrote:
I see no problem with either 3.7 or 3.8 in this respect, the latest overlayfs (which is in factory) applies without major problems to either one.
What does it mean "is in factory" here? I don't have such module
I just downloaded and installed the -default kernel the buildservice and overlayfs works fine. Thanks, Miklos -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-kernel+unsubscribe@opensuse.org To contact the owner, e-mail: opensuse-kernel+owner@opensuse.org
On 09.01.2013 15:17, Miklos Szeredi wrote:
On Wed, 2013-01-09 at 14:51 +0100, Stephan Kulow wrote:
On 09.01.2013 14:49, Miklos Szeredi wrote:
I see no problem with either 3.7 or 3.8 in this respect, the latest overlayfs (which is in factory) applies without major problems to either one.
What does it mean "is in factory" here? I don't have such module
I just downloaded and installed the -default kernel the buildservice and overlayfs works fine.
Cool, so it sounds easy to have it for the factory kernel. I would like to rework the live cds to persistent USB images and playing with overlayfs sounds good. Greetings, Stephan -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-kernel+unsubscribe@opensuse.org To contact the owner, e-mail: opensuse-kernel+owner@opensuse.org
Le mercredi 09 janvier 2013 à 15:35 +0100, Stephan Kulow a écrit :
On 09.01.2013 15:17, Miklos Szeredi wrote:
On Wed, 2013-01-09 at 14:51 +0100, Stephan Kulow wrote:
On 09.01.2013 14:49, Miklos Szeredi wrote:
I see no problem with either 3.7 or 3.8 in this respect, the latest overlayfs (which is in factory) applies without major problems to either one.
What does it mean "is in factory" here? I don't have such module
I just downloaded and installed the -default kernel the buildservice and overlayfs works fine.
Cool, so it sounds easy to have it for the factory kernel. I would like to rework the live cds to persistent USB images and playing with overlayfs sounds good.
Thanks for working on this, this is a feature I liked a lot and am missing these days. -- Jean Delvare Suse L3 -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-kernel+unsubscribe@opensuse.org To contact the owner, e-mail: opensuse-kernel+owner@opensuse.org
Am 09.01.2013 15:35, schrieb Stephan Kulow:
On 09.01.2013 15:17, Miklos Szeredi wrote:
On Wed, 2013-01-09 at 14:51 +0100, Stephan Kulow wrote:
On 09.01.2013 14:49, Miklos Szeredi wrote:
I see no problem with either 3.7 or 3.8 in this respect, the latest overlayfs (which is in factory) applies without major problems to either one.
What does it mean "is in factory" here? I don't have such module
I just downloaded and installed the -default kernel the buildservice and overlayfs works fine.
Cool, so it sounds easy to have it for the factory kernel. I would like to rework the live cds to persistent USB images and playing with overlayfs sounds good.
Any news on 12.3 kernel? Greetings, Stephan -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-kernel+unsubscribe@opensuse.org To contact the owner, e-mail: opensuse-kernel+owner@opensuse.org
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On 1/15/13 1:21 AM, Stephan Kulow wrote:
Am 09.01.2013 15:35, schrieb Stephan Kulow:
On 09.01.2013 15:17, Miklos Szeredi wrote:
On Wed, 2013-01-09 at 14:51 +0100, Stephan Kulow wrote:
On 09.01.2013 14:49, Miklos Szeredi wrote:
I see no problem with either 3.7 or 3.8 in this respect, the latest overlayfs (which is in factory) applies without major problems to either one.
What does it mean "is in factory" here? I don't have such module
I just downloaded and installed the -default kernel the buildservice and overlayfs works fine.
Cool, so it sounds easy to have it for the factory kernel. I would like to rework the live cds to persistent USB images and playing with overlayfs sounds good.
Any news on 12.3 kernel?
This is still waiting on the Kernel:openSUSE-12.3 project to be created. Until then, there's no source package to submit with. - -Jeff - -- Jeff Mahoney SUSE Labs -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG/MacGPG2 v2.0.18 (Darwin) Comment: GPGTools - http://gpgtools.org Comment: Using GnuPG with undefined - http://www.enigmail.net/ iQIcBAEBAgAGBQJQ9YF4AAoJEB57S2MheeWywUEP/0/d7EMgGRuyC07AdSDojprn t1t/xvWofL4cirYN3xvysoUJ2ngzUviyRZc9lGHe1kcrGU+MF8eiJU+2rhFKhazr anMiPuwGLhgQd5YxVoL9746SvGDoTxrWT+0XcpEIQuLUoKDETOILXW5Jo01dhOcu VNDUUXqDUzXgwzDfLkgmL1euD8ahXArCgRoo3XCy8Jrnj5skajbt3lqg978tr8L0 MtyYmt6zoza7vwsEFKAU84iRa9ObMaQi6dwW9U1kuAroei9Or6cqmlTqUONjEYYA HQrSrImiL6tpUc2i29VyHif5cbwtcBN5qXADiIn9NL3j1Y+SY9w1FZdfuWNfk1uw XOkNspnXbB+B+3/z8osHU7MtTB1PEjjm2iDPg5qdeAeuuLA6T7sRGrzmxRz6OtIH Q0NrtVDPiYv9DXZoTryXyLuIUuLbEEb8tiQJzoFnt/M3SkPX9gOsWVoZ7bC1QDbC Dekrzm6In3PxHX3ir85mRN01Sz3uTMd56PRkVB4MyXd7tHPppF/sbjddWderkIPq qCsydih5llL11kesyVcRMK9Y3gv27pONIpPlYd9Zs25FPrLkTpHCKDzH0E0SQs95 gd2dcgcFsPOHOhJcim1ltaf9VxOcYcXa/MHXBgoNW3M4ut//4iREfCeTMsKiynuz k2zFVppqqoMj5OB1HP6e =UjBk -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-kernel+unsubscribe@opensuse.org To contact the owner, e-mail: opensuse-kernel+owner@opensuse.org
On 15.1.2013 17:19, Jeff Mahoney wrote:
On 1/15/13 1:21 AM, Stephan Kulow wrote:
Any news on 12.3 kernel?
This is still waiting on the Kernel:openSUSE-12.3 project to be created. Until then, there's no source package to submit with.
I enabled the openSUSE-12.3 in the configuration. Michal -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-kernel+unsubscribe@opensuse.org To contact the owner, e-mail: opensuse-kernel+owner@opensuse.org
On 15.1.2013 17:29, Michal Marek wrote:
On 15.1.2013 17:19, Jeff Mahoney wrote:
On 1/15/13 1:21 AM, Stephan Kulow wrote:
Any news on 12.3 kernel?
This is still waiting on the Kernel:openSUSE-12.3 project to be created. Until then, there's no source package to submit with.
I enabled the openSUSE-12.3 in the configuration.
It is there now. Michal -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-kernel+unsubscribe@opensuse.org To contact the owner, e-mail: opensuse-kernel+owner@opensuse.org
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On 1/15/13 11:43 AM, Michal Marek wrote:
On 15.1.2013 17:29, Michal Marek wrote:
On 15.1.2013 17:19, Jeff Mahoney wrote:
On 1/15/13 1:21 AM, Stephan Kulow wrote:
Any news on 12.3 kernel?
This is still waiting on the Kernel:openSUSE-12.3 project to be created. Until then, there's no source package to submit with.
I enabled the openSUSE-12.3 in the configuration.
It is there now.
Thanks, Michal. Stephan - I've submitted the kernel as SR 148613. The devel project should be switched to Kernel:openSUSE-12.3 from Kernel:HEAD as well. - -Jeff - -- Jeff Mahoney SUSE Labs -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG/MacGPG2 v2.0.18 (Darwin) Comment: GPGTools - http://gpgtools.org Comment: Using GnuPG with undefined - http://www.enigmail.net/ iQIcBAEBAgAGBQJQ9YfEAAoJEB57S2MheeWyKeMQAMZHiFhHtHbBVWeTLmuuvy2r ZzzHRY0qQwf8jL0yDJl8yuHU/ByEvldkwY33zCpZ5eTbyxUT+7gewUxR0C/fO6Kv V5nwrYMYkIzFOAVfNUZnDj8fjO0M1vd+q7ftThsRn0iKu5/6W3GtZwL3UbXaM2JQ Xg5SOahpn3YRBJvOBIjYgOo/osWeI2IlmScLY/pQC4yYpke05O92J5miOEjM0S1G x2Yj0ED68dieukOILd1ojBZnIlqTjazozlFvKGIdI8JaqGcO2NpChSzZwLDYZWlE wc8iRrz0pxXnOshetZK1a2FLlN/sHTySRfLIlqvZm6+EoXtui0Hb3K3ntrwR6hhT jKiyZF9bRswzx7XiHrL/JUHJWOX773Z7bL38r+dGb2+T2eTx5P8VSu/F4muro5F7 VNK0YV5ZjE8ucmrChi2Yw5SFBKibody9YWtdEziFxJQ28C9pYa3kd6O8/ZTQwX6T iO8PCpwNdlKpdwfk+XOT6ZYcJoulpi3J8fAAohMyzeOhnImBsRZF0bWKi8QfEl1P oIKcN5iyJt51koThqMZMyhZE1x7BkjH8R92g76/Far/abjR3UzInT2Rspf9yC5Bo 6SzTh6UazqHwaNtpUI84vdKnrkLTtNr4ldbfPXoyPReJpHEY10Y0/znBg4Cf1ZrC T9XAJkaLm+XkDUQk9Iey =JoWx -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-kernel+unsubscribe@opensuse.org To contact the owner, e-mail: opensuse-kernel+owner@opensuse.org
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Am 15.01.2013 17:19, schrieb Jeff Mahoney:
On 1/15/13 1:21 AM, Stephan Kulow wrote:
Am 09.01.2013 15:35, schrieb Stephan Kulow:
On 09.01.2013 15:17, Miklos Szeredi wrote:
On Wed, 2013-01-09 at 14:51 +0100, Stephan Kulow wrote:
On 09.01.2013 14:49, Miklos Szeredi wrote:
I see no problem with either 3.7 or 3.8 in this respect, the latest overlayfs (which is in factory) applies without major problems to either one.
What does it mean "is in factory" here? I don't have such module
I just downloaded and installed the -default kernel the buildservice and overlayfs works fine.
Cool, so it sounds easy to have it for the factory kernel. I would like to rework the live cds to persistent USB images and playing with overlayfs sounds good.
Any news on 12.3 kernel?
This is still waiting on the Kernel:openSUSE-12.3 project to be created. Until then, there's no source package to submit with.
Now that the project was setup and the devel project changed - can we have overlayfs? Greetings, Stephan -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.19 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://www.enigmail.net/ iEYEARECAAYFAlD9XkYACgkQwFSBhlBjoJbXFgCgrm8vUxrv//LrpeY8ozlUTNpP VRgAoKxBDDRuy2Txmji2Fvm0mg0GvJHz =K3wR -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-kernel+unsubscribe@opensuse.org To contact the owner, e-mail: opensuse-kernel+owner@opensuse.org
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On 1/21/13 10:27 AM, Stephan Kulow wrote:
Am 15.01.2013 17:19, schrieb Jeff Mahoney:
On 1/15/13 1:21 AM, Stephan Kulow wrote:
Am 09.01.2013 15:35, schrieb Stephan Kulow:
On 09.01.2013 15:17, Miklos Szeredi wrote:
On Wed, 2013-01-09 at 14:51 +0100, Stephan Kulow wrote:
On 09.01.2013 14:49, Miklos Szeredi wrote:
> I see no problem with either 3.7 or 3.8 in this > respect, the latest overlayfs (which is in factory) > applies without major problems to either one.
What does it mean "is in factory" here? I don't have such module
I just downloaded and installed the -default kernel the buildservice and overlayfs works fine.
Cool, so it sounds easy to have it for the factory kernel. I would like to rework the live cds to persistent USB images and playing with overlayfs sounds good.
Any news on 12.3 kernel?
This is still waiting on the Kernel:openSUSE-12.3 project to be created. Until then, there's no source package to submit with.
Now that the project was setup and the devel project changed - can we have overlayfs?
The overlayfs patches are already in that kernel. Or is there some other requirement? - -Jeff - -- Jeff Mahoney SUSE Labs -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG/MacGPG2 v2.0.18 (Darwin) Comment: GPGTools - http://gpgtools.org Comment: Using GnuPG with undefined - http://www.enigmail.net/ iQIcBAEBAgAGBQJQ/WHBAAoJEB57S2MheeWyR/kP/R7cvLBH2asnKedyt5vxPKjm lWMP6Qj867u55RvxdSNqSzyfR8Ltu0TvQDDBXhayiMdZ1yC1Z0h4psD6vTYZKSpv aNLtDw/sGpe06FM8xzzYBqkAyEc4B4H01xGyTmzGDiBJAHQwJk9m3FHi3KruF/Y3 QUYJIzJtZ3MCrw2etWjXhYNa1b0lo1Q3zeTd9jXENePsNZfMwz0JYlt/RdDjuEdA z4LnjDkDWIM7yPeB8b3893zzWe/fZ6vdefiSb7RKfnRpf0eJCGViWnhzCulBub79 6ZntcWu3qWwop1q0dha7/3sEpn0ajd0aIENV19+763wodS7tDRbkuotJ50kZPYbx nZA/kUPvhY4QeFIVCJUwcT7E3Pp3Y2rGOcVO6HUOr8XVgZlpJgQbtZ18y7UOQXRF JkWdq+s27gcsCe3HwCk7dCxbB1bdvEGTTHk3Q5sAaXKJKwRCNMnD9NXR3g+BcDla sekLnDgI6acEHTiJcSjUNIQ2G3tlIn+9Joi+6U28dcZDoKgmc3qC+fSSpi01eX5V ruE8Ee1vJWGdrNx3/xn+y5bZO5eF7gcPRgJgCni60BoCulDHi6h4mxEK8GeqqqSP uVXZN/EI2UfWvo9rSkR953ax3o9olLZOPFEJ0vq1kK/z2mx7HnHOwVSLFO+gxQez 1IBsWUIALnlgAimDo7wY =QM30 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-kernel+unsubscribe@opensuse.org To contact the owner, e-mail: opensuse-kernel+owner@opensuse.org
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Am 21.01.2013 16:41, schrieb Jeff Mahoney:
Now that the project was setup and the devel project changed - can we have overlayfs?
The overlayfs patches are already in that kernel. Or is there some other requirement?
Then you guys confused me. Looks like they are in since september? Greetings, Stephan -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.19 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://www.enigmail.net/ iEYEARECAAYFAlD9a+AACgkQwFSBhlBjoJZ7HwCePE0Sgy5oCr9VuFfsG2BAPTiz CCAAnjRgtxe6U5oGbaB4eGgj9+Rt5ur9 =D6Yy -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-kernel+unsubscribe@opensuse.org To contact the owner, e-mail: opensuse-kernel+owner@opensuse.org
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On 1/21/13 11:25 AM, Stephan Kulow wrote:
Am 21.01.2013 16:41, schrieb Jeff Mahoney:
Now that the project was setup and the devel project changed - can we have overlayfs?
The overlayfs patches are already in that kernel. Or is there some other requirement?
Then you guys confused me. Looks like they are in since september?
Yep. I think Miklos mentioned that but it might've gotten lost. - -Jeff - -- Jeff Mahoney SUSE Labs -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG/MacGPG2 v2.0.18 (Darwin) Comment: GPGTools - http://gpgtools.org Comment: Using GnuPG with undefined - http://www.enigmail.net/ iQIcBAEBAgAGBQJQ/W1EAAoJEB57S2MheeWy+NYQAIxMupjO7s3/JUFG6i63PhJr CnqZ9qA+g8ud9IYfjf6Vt5w0y5jhSS0YkSG7U2tt4RyTtQFFqdupb3u/oqjV/uQJ KCyOalwsZk/jtQEoRB8CceUVT+fIs6DOGs9TYS2w6YhVT4Ba7qvj83grnBCqe93C dj3lOPZfRT0lfnyC1QonkGbGizmx11HPLGwOxzNM/G1X/CgGVR1uuCSJqDJfHga9 1A39sASBdlQ4Dc6uF0/gsJHHbHM+bUEqS93rq4TmuIf4rvAMlEedYqOgc7IJhNkm dwcoa2F6wqCt8blCtI6NgvgSoaLWTRHo7fr3FrEbNt4JD0Khk4QBd8qqsXu2aFjw LvTExjGZ9dcHnWiElQYvvWd6HA6EitJztP6mdgxv+BM8CPSKtDrs1g6kd2lUMxKb iu9owMpu69Ncu8FOQcf+zWL0goX/7S1jenIbxXn0afbLOSqv65jna6UxyN35ggRA tON7117TrdOKDFMWqzYsHH/UIyMa4cL5qbVR/INXASNdx+39dCPPOUT2ZJEluw/F RSmJcDfAC2ridKzD/hak7x5/ShgUUKg+LqUM+cz96Y1D686hIEEgATWhYy5TgAN+ ilSxDv9FKabF7IuU541Pfu3BybBDKaCMr9yi5ZPYd6sf1TsSj5UyoDiLiReVrTKf lOiuAmY3WoSRwxhutfLg =xrty -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-kernel+unsubscribe@opensuse.org To contact the owner, e-mail: opensuse-kernel+owner@opensuse.org
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Am 15.01.2013 17:19, schrieb Jeff Mahoney: Now that the project was setup and the devel project changed - can we have overlayfs? Greetings, Stephan -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.19 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://www.enigmail.net/ iEYEARECAAYFAlD9XkMACgkQwFSBhlBjoJaT9ACeJdBmsRiwzoTdHKfOu/3XcJV0 u7kAn3E3NWZHXVsRkx6/q2CN6SafkZHz =t6Ye -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-kernel+unsubscribe@opensuse.org To contact the owner, e-mail: opensuse-kernel+owner@opensuse.org
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Am 21.01.2013 16:27, schrieb Stephan Kulow:
Am 15.01.2013 17:19, schrieb Jeff Mahoney:
Now that the project was setup and the devel project changed - can we have overlayfs?
I have no idea what thunderbird did here - I only wrote one mail :) Greetings, Stephan -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.19 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://www.enigmail.net/ iEYEARECAAYFAlD9XrIACgkQwFSBhlBjoJaclACaA/vfgQL2BZa6o8FfL4GMCEwp XbkAoI8tNOcXb8rJP7I8rIpVXKgsyla+ =XC/g -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-kernel+unsubscribe@opensuse.org To contact the owner, e-mail: opensuse-kernel+owner@opensuse.org
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On 1/8/13 7:48 AM, Stephan Kulow wrote:
Hi,
Are you aiming for 3.8 or will we stick with 3.7.X? Next week I want to release Beta1 and it should have the correct code line for the kernel. If your choice is 3.8, then we should go to RC2 IMO.
We can do 3.8 if the the possibility of slipping the 12.3 release date until after 3.8 goes final is on the table. The kernel typically takes 90 days between releases and, ignoring any delays due to the holidays, that puts the next release at approx 11 Mar. As we've seen in past releases, peak instability is at -rc2 (which is already merged modulo Xen and the ext4 richacl support, which needs upstream coordination and a path to convert existing users if there are any). I've already merged the -rc2 kernel into master, so that part is easy enough. It's the commitment on the back end to be able to slip the schedule that's important. - -Jeff - -- Jeff Mahoney SUSE Labs -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG/MacGPG2 v2.0.18 (Darwin) Comment: GPGTools - http://gpgtools.org Comment: Using GnuPG with undefined - http://www.enigmail.net/ iQIcBAEBAgAGBQJQ7E3BAAoJEB57S2MheeWyViMQALF97Lty+JHTv0nyha9ltWI5 5ioTcJdG6RCjAO4nXumttjM1tLgczMtn3z/qvWeLqk34wTY7r0CZ52W3Nuji3TiH ZvBcncyqigoPBHk64b1B6PbQrMMkamx4l/N0jKX0yKAYbbDBZj0AynmHx2kktcPJ m+m0PU8p+vUZmJjnxVsgNzmhtxZb0PABfEqM6f5XeQAwM06b8g8F5Em0wKhZ09fQ TMGu12ZLr8XE5g2dQhJEWToiwN02sHg+aNh5+2n3Zq9TdCsQhNlZwbYoZBUTWk/k HbGdXNEJfaTv9+ykZdiZY7x3mGU9VgL5Ar4jiFT4tyXy2gzPfOYS4yymknVWEF9V iWz6fRn6jrAlF+KICc/pEx5HXdKT+Gg/TR5gzUrXNabthYjB+h5UBsFLt5FFP53E 68L/LPxJx/A0lHfWcPbz+zvao+nxCCjvO/sfynoxSzWHRULcxSd9FjShczQweOMU iIf+t1qBSk+1doaKEQ9oV1JX1/7v/KSFWNlR1d4FnR+xYXiDdddXuMsU/DLU0iQP obavWe2CFN24yoi8rmdCSMHJ/0bSa+BCo0czYwKjq1HI4p4U1lefkmNVs3GE9dHs 26ADA8UNgoT0cQjtCQ/b6/sztLOhZTWe2g3hsVPKvDvLNV3G4V8p2XTcOheI1PRH bBl/mIpWViOuedo3BGDe =Fi4+ -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-kernel+unsubscribe@opensuse.org To contact the owner, e-mail: opensuse-kernel+owner@opensuse.org
On 08.01.2013 17:48, Jeff Mahoney wrote:
On 1/8/13 7:48 AM, Stephan Kulow wrote:
Hi,
Are you aiming for 3.8 or will we stick with 3.7.X? Next week I want to release Beta1 and it should have the correct code line for the kernel. If your choice is 3.8, then we should go to RC2 IMO.
We can do 3.8 if the the possibility of slipping the 12.3 release date until after 3.8 goes final is on the table. The kernel typically takes 90 days between releases and, ignoring any delays due to the holidays, that puts the next release at approx 11 Mar. As we've seen in past releases, peak instability is at -rc2 (which is already merged modulo Xen and the ext4 richacl support, which needs upstream coordination and a path to convert existing users if there are any). I've already merged the -rc2 kernel into master, so that part is easy enough. It's the commitment on the back end to be able to slip the schedule that's important.
Nah, that won't work then. GM is for 7 Mar - I don't want us to put ourselves in Linus' hands, so we would need to release with a RC with a promised final update. But that wouldn't be fair to neither the kernel community or to our users, so then let's go with a 3.7.X and change the devel project now. Greetings, Stephan -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-kernel+unsubscribe@opensuse.org To contact the owner, e-mail: opensuse-kernel+owner@opensuse.org
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On 1/8/13 11:52 AM, Stephan Kulow wrote:
On 08.01.2013 17:48, Jeff Mahoney wrote:
On 1/8/13 7:48 AM, Stephan Kulow wrote:
Hi,
Are you aiming for 3.8 or will we stick with 3.7.X? Next week I want to release Beta1 and it should have the correct code line for the kernel. If your choice is 3.8, then we should go to RC2 IMO.
We can do 3.8 if the the possibility of slipping the 12.3 release date until after 3.8 goes final is on the table. The kernel typically takes 90 days between releases and, ignoring any delays due to the holidays, that puts the next release at approx 11 Mar. As we've seen in past releases, peak instability is at -rc2 (which is already merged modulo Xen and the ext4 richacl support, which needs upstream coordination and a path to convert existing users if there are any). I've already merged the -rc2 kernel into master, so that part is easy enough. It's the commitment on the back end to be able to slip the schedule that's important.
Nah, that won't work then. GM is for 7 Mar - I don't want us to put ourselves in Linus' hands, so we would need to release with a RC with a promised final update. But that wouldn't be fair to neither the kernel community or to our users, so then let's go with a 3.7.X and change the devel project now.
Yeah, I wouldn't want to release GM with an RC kernel either. Sticking with 3.7 is easy enough. - -Jeff - -- Jeff Mahoney SUSE Labs -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG/MacGPG2 v2.0.18 (Darwin) Comment: GPGTools - http://gpgtools.org Comment: Using GnuPG with undefined - http://www.enigmail.net/ iQIcBAEBAgAGBQJQ7E9PAAoJEB57S2MheeWy7DUP/3qWkAqrwNOQfP0+0JzcDTTY Oagv2Mw6+b0ZRjjmP9PbfvLf+4v5AdUehpE2zx2M7A3lNeKEuOGnIy7fDTbz5doV GAuHqCIeRFB1Xxtlk2stf/x9EQhMP7ec0VNpznTKTGmMBZPxiQgufjOLsV54UB2X l0/nhfXYW9b317Pirnt14truw8sX8qZLQXSBdfYhbqAC1Z3HPADVNU3G84rGd6wU v+t+hdpR7p3t0DMirYUmQTfIaTaPbNRUr+CHAznvsGHNerj/aBrd20vhnxarbxmq NgedzLo0m/L4Zy3S/1Fn6vm9YRUoTTkZ1GTzx0Pnny8PpT5Fdw7spnCnkDI5Cdhg 5b61qm5CndRaSvr+lvhQgr/h5ah29MSddtbH8YVlpOWAh9WWdTpQQisM+m4OFydj PHZMLf9zghSnY+jBWYYRlc+gZidUOVmDhuKsiACsMnwBSHls78ql7aOGGPoOxxNG ZFnUSDbMCZUJgQineMLJK94+t71XqVlaK9EYCcXx2W6ziM54/vb/72imSoST5QXz ooT8tOe6KY96JWaaqiP6k9RgSn+Ds2WCrMB2TBe80Ut+XNDeDM+jRjbmOpsSkuJp m/4H3BJsx1HZw7dzSIwEZoynQPSQptHriuLbuY4VcuPbpu3bVlLxp/og6pDOfSub XtZtenOCHgNZLEJSGdBZ =gXW5 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-kernel+unsubscribe@opensuse.org To contact the owner, e-mail: opensuse-kernel+owner@opensuse.org
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On 1/8/13 11:52 AM, Stephan Kulow wrote:
On 08.01.2013 17:48, Jeff Mahoney wrote:
On 1/8/13 7:48 AM, Stephan Kulow wrote:
Hi,
Are you aiming for 3.8 or will we stick with 3.7.X? Next week I want to release Beta1 and it should have the correct code line for the kernel. If your choice is 3.8, then we should go to RC2 IMO.
We can do 3.8 if the the possibility of slipping the 12.3 release date until after 3.8 goes final is on the table. The kernel typically takes 90 days between releases and, ignoring any delays due to the holidays, that puts the next release at approx 11 Mar. As we've seen in past releases, peak instability is at -rc2 (which is already merged modulo Xen and the ext4 richacl support, which needs upstream coordination and a path to convert existing users if there are any). I've already merged the -rc2 kernel into master, so that part is easy enough. It's the commitment on the back end to be able to slip the schedule that's important.
Nah, that won't work then. GM is for 7 Mar - I don't want us to put ourselves in Linus' hands, so we would need to release with a RC with a promised final update. But that wouldn't be fair to neither the kernel community or to our users, so then let's go with a 3.7.X and change the devel project now.
I've just branched the kernel to openSUSE-12.3 (from before the 3.8-rc1 update and also grabbed the hyperv update from Olaf). Michal, can we get that set up for KOTD building? Thanks! - -Jeff - -- Jeff Mahoney SUSE Labs -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG/MacGPG2 v2.0.18 (Darwin) Comment: GPGTools - http://gpgtools.org Comment: Using GnuPG with undefined - http://www.enigmail.net/ iQIcBAEBAgAGBQJQ7FQIAAoJEB57S2MheeWyxSoP/3oW5pcnCLzKdSrTHPirmN7Z q9z1rSC2d+S0kRwkTjlqab5XOnQIP50+A415j2wm8Cxl1mDz+1QDaMYmGIWXoXP6 lYJzD/diwTECGDlDMU0uuL9Iylna2L5aQ/34WBZ/NfNVbxuKATf/nw7EZn82ex+Y XF09uCRxr3jsPyWhWl8fg15HExMwNqgO3P+3EfR4zVltM1tZ23IwYdmguSt4+Sj6 acHXM3K7aslvSmT9L7mQcEyomrwWvk1iTZUUs9ik7/980LvFHFZ4qXO1rGJOI+P9 vtDq6XAvjVYzZhS6qE4qr2wp/xi3XcXc21JyOwMyyC92st/Iqs5jwDz6f/Ji5Jch Ki77SiXJqefOuD5eCWAQ04e8Y15cc51VOtpWCn7SnFLX0pOxDWmKY38tdaTpTCrQ 33+MItXYzK9s7qwWF0H1eQ1nDQYEm/2/9TFWz4Q33liPvxzYXJTKuUlKSaJBj8mj 7ZwQOj3U3XEGR3JjzZe3ZvkaeH/y2k0Z29unaZl43wmlnRaaJmKBhBiDjo2LcnRk pesFWV+2O6/O35jbgmFPoMg6QUctu4UNOaKreZEWtfb5w4muRxMD1ZCU7QdezWzl I2hkANwV2nzCkax6euiZ6sDCVGwaiVe9cmSSlYPcdfQ/wD00jDcpI0tg7WV1NLy9 EAj9qZmQxlhNBuwaCuda =pBGV -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-kernel+unsubscribe@opensuse.org To contact the owner, e-mail: opensuse-kernel+owner@opensuse.org
participants (5)
-
Jean Delvare -
Jeff Mahoney -
Michal Marek -
Miklos Szeredi -
Stephan Kulow