-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Jan Engelhardt wrote:
On Oct 14 2007 12:12, Jeff Mahoney wrote:
It's the only kernel we ship where the source tree differs between flavors.
Is that a problem? I do not think so, since I managed to create a kernel-rt-source without many changes to the specfile. (Largely the use of %macros I've been talking about and about, and a few naming changes). And all it takes to build rt KMPs is to make sure the rt-source is available in the build system (along with the rest of the gang, kernel-syms, kernel-source).
When it's only one case, it's not so bad. You've just described the problem. However, with older releases (in the 8.x days), we had a different kernel source tree for every architecture, which was a pain to manage. Maintaining a single source tree for all architectures and flavors has been a goal for the kernel teams for quite some time, and with this one recent exception, it's one we've been successful at obtaining. - -Jeff - -- Jeff Mahoney SUSE Labs -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.4-svn0 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with SUSE - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFHEkLGLPWxlyuTD7IRAmgpAKCnzSouAhR40jZFDQob/iak2USYSwCgiER7 pXO6332m7nP0KmjVq/e/HUE= =9qw8 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-kernel+unsubscribe@opensuse.org For additional commands, e-mail: opensuse-kernel+help@opensuse.org