On 01/14/2014 03:40 PM, Takashi Iwai wrote:
At Mon, 13 Jan 2014 21:30:30 +0100,
Jiri Slaby wrote:
On 01/13/2014 11:38 AM, Takashi Iwai wrote:
what about just taking stable branch? It can be either temporarily
> taken until the new kernel is released, or we can use always stable
> branch for FACTORY.
I would be fine with always taking stable branch. As factory is supposed
to be stable itself, that sounds like a good idea in general :)
Jiri, what do you think?
I don't mind; stable is there for you to take it, if you want :).
BUT: where is the "next" kernel going to be tested then?
Do you mean linux-next, or the current rc kernels?
Oh, I meant rc kernels.
That is, should we let stable for Tumbleweed, and
testing rc kernels?
I thought that using stable kernel for FACTORY would align to the
policy we're trying to achieve recently -- make FACTORY stable /
usable. But, of course, this cuts off the side as a tester.
This was exactly my point. But I'm not biased to any of the sides. For
me, both have equal pros&cons.
To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-kernel+unsubscribe(a)opensuse.org
To contact the owner, e-mail: opensuse-kernel+owner(a)opensuse.org