![](https://seccdn.libravatar.org/avatar/bcd65ca98f9d97839f15c54575c7edec.jpg?s=120&d=mm&r=g)
On 12/6/13, 4:11 AM, Stephan Kulow wrote:
On 05.12.2013 17:51, Jeff Mahoney wrote:
On 12/5/13, 8:17 AM, Stephan Kulow wrote:
On 05.12.2013 14:06, Andrew Wafaa wrote:
On 5 December 2013 11:28, Takashi Iwai <tiwai@suse.de> wrote:
Hi,
Since 3.11.y maintenance was discontinued by Greg, Ubuntu took over it. It made me wonder: are we willing to continue 3.11.y for openSUSE 13.1 updates, just relying on Ubuntu? Or, can we just move on 3.12.y?
Has the precedence been set of changing version of the kernel after release, I don't remember it happening in the past? That aside, personally I would feel much happier using an upstream maintained kernel, so if that means moving to 3.12.y then so be it. I
That would also moving 12.2 to 3.4.72 and 12.3 to 3.10.22 - or are we only worried about 13.1 maintenance?
These are "standard" stable updates. They happen more or less automatically already when Jiri Slaby has spare cycles.
Updating from 3.7 to 3.10 in 12.3 in spare cycles? I don't think that will be fair to our users.
Ah, I misread and didn't parse the release-version mapping. No, we don't have any plans to propose something like that. Just normal long-term -stable updates. -Jeff -- Jeff Mahoney SUSE Labs