Gentlemen! I suggest staying with seperate DB-systems for Groupware, ERP, and the like for several reasons. First of all a DB crash only kills parts of the server, secondly the system load is distributed more evenly on multicore/multicpu boxes, backups - at least with bacula - are more straightforward, on hardware RAID5/6/10 disk access is faster, .... I could think of several more reasons but I don't want to be too chatty. I don't like the single-datastore-idea (like the SME servers approach keeping everything in mysql) - it makes the systems too vulnerable. For example a corrupt mySQL instantly kills an SME box. Actually that (and the lack of 64bit support) made me switch from SME to invis .... Cheers Markus On 11/04/2010 04:38 PM, Jörg Stephan wrote:
Am 04.11.2010 16:31, schrieb Stefan Schäfer:
Yes, this is a little bit oversized. We have to install both, because Group-e needs mysql and LX-Office PostgreSQL.
Stefan
Oh, okay,
and there isnt a way to change that, or giving an software an try which uses the same db. Maybe we could even switch to drizzle instead of mysql. Well, i dont know what amount of resources both databases will need when the are running, it depends on what the customer do with them.
Jörg -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-invis+unsubscribe@opensuse.org For additional commands, e-mail: opensuse-invis+help@opensuse.org