What merits does Monsoon have vs. going with Transmission? Are there any benefits? Transmission is fully working today and has a tremendous amount of support, is openSUSE looking to be different for the sake of being different, or are there tangible differences? On Mon, Mar 23, 2009 at 2:52 PM, Atri <badshah400@aim.com> wrote:
On Monday 23 March 2009 23:08:41 Kirill Kirillov wrote:
Hi.
I'm using Transmission in openSUSE 11.1. It has Russian translation and much clear look and it's well-integrated into GNOME (it even supports text besides icons option). The only visual glitch for me is using of default application icon instead of its own.
In my opinion, we should give the monsoon project some more time. Perhaps we could come back and discuss the issue of the default torrent client around May/June. There seems to be good work going on giving some direction to the project, and I am using the version 0.20 of the application (from mono community repository), and it works well. Not that I have anything against transmission, but I think that having decided to use monsoon as the default client in 11.0 we should really not judge it based on the (small) duration between 11.0 and 11.1 (during which, frankly, monsoon did not end up a finished product). At the moment, though, it looks like (to me) that good work is going into it. Regards, -- Atri -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-gnome+unsubscribe@opensuse.org For additional commands, e-mail: opensuse-gnome+help@opensuse.org
-- GPG Key ID: C92EF367 / 1428 FE8E 1E07 DDA8 EFD7 195F DCCD F5B3 C92E F367 -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-gnome+unsubscribe@opensuse.org For additional commands, e-mail: opensuse-gnome+help@opensuse.org