[opensuse-factory] Re: Post to opensuse-factory@opensuse.org denied: how to write bug against "process" of how root-certs are distributed?
Why would this be rejected? I didn't include the message about root certificates, as it might get it blocked again...? See if this goes through... -------- Original Message -------- Subject: Post to opensuse-factory@opensuse.org denied: how to write bug against "process" of how root-certs are distributed? Date: Tue, 15 Nov 2016 21:30:12 +0000 From: opensuse-factory+owner(at)opensuse.org Hi, this is the Mlmmj program managing the <opensuse-factory(at)opensuse.org> mailing list. The message from <suse@tlinx.org> with subject "how to write bug against "process" of how root-certs are distributed?" was unable to be delivered to the list because of an access rule set up by the list administrator. (The denied message is below.)
L. A. Walsh wrote:
I didn't include the message about root certificates, as it might get it blocked again...?
Guess not? (didn't see it attached) ... so forwarding it as a bounce goes through, but not sending it directly? Um...?weird? -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-factory+unsubscribe@opensuse.org To contact the owner, e-mail: opensuse-factory+owner@opensuse.org
On 2016-11-15 22:33, L. A. Walsh wrote:
Why would this be rejected? I didn't include the message about root certificates, as it might get it blocked again...?
See if this goes through...
You could ask the list administrator :-) Typical reason is that the mail contains html part. It is possible that the part was removed in the bounce, so that this time it went through, or that the attachments do not get the same filtering. Just guessing. -- Cheers / Saludos, Carlos E. R. (from 13.1 x86_64 "Bottle" at Telcontar)
Carlos E. R. wrote:
On 2016-11-15 22:33, L. A. Walsh wrote:
Why would this be rejected? I didn't include the message about root certificates, as it might get it blocked again...?
See if this goes through...
You could ask the list administrator :-)
Yes, this is usually the better approach - other list members will typically have no idea. It is a pity the mailing list software does not append a proper explanation. Linda, your posting was rejected because it contained a header: Z-Quarantine-ID (s/Z/X/) I don't know why, it's probably an ancient rule, established long before my time. -- Per Jessen, Zürich (6.8°C) -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-factory+unsubscribe@opensuse.org To contact the owner, e-mail: opensuse-factory+owner@opensuse.org
Per Jessen wrote:
Linda, your posting was rejected because it contained a header:
Z-Quarantine-ID
(s/Z/X/)
I don't know why, it's probably an ancient rule, established long before my time.
Dunno how it got there either... Sigh..the more advanced the problem, the more it seems like black magic... ;-) -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-factory+unsubscribe@opensuse.org To contact the owner, e-mail: opensuse-factory+owner@opensuse.org
On 2016-11-16 10:39, L.A. Walsh wrote:
Per Jessen wrote:
Linda, your posting was rejected because it contained a header:
Z-Quarantine-ID
(s/Z/X/)
I don't know why, it's probably an ancient rule, established long before my time.
Dunno how it got there either...
Sigh..the more advanced the problem, the more it seems like black magic... ;-)
It seems to me the output of an antivirus check. It can be yours or it can be from one of the mailservers in the route. Yes, it is certainly a pity that the list software doesn't give some explanation of the possible reason. -- Cheers / Saludos, Carlos E. R. (from 13.1 x86_64 "Bottle" at Telcontar)
participants (4)
-
Carlos E. R. -
L. A. Walsh -
L.A. Walsh
-
Per Jessen