On Wednesday 2015-05-27 21:24, Dominique Leuenberger / DimStar wrote:

On Wed, 2015-05-27 at 22:18 +0300, Andrei Dziahel wrote:

...

Hey list

2015-05-27 22:10 GMT+03:00 Ludwig Nussel :

...

==== exo-lang ==== Version update (0.10.4 -> 0.10.6) Subpackages: exo-tools libexo-1-0

shouldn't exo-lang be a subpackage of libexo?

All those packages are all built from the same .spec file... the bot has to guess any name as the 'main' package (IIRC, it takes them alphabetically). In this case especially, there is no package created with the same name as the .spec file (.spec being called exo... any guess as good as any other)

But the .spec basename (better: the Name: field in the .spec) *is* a better guess than what it guesses currently. -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-factory+unsubscribe@opensuse.org To contact the owner, e-mail: opensuse-factory+owner@opensuse.org

On Thu, 2015-05-28 at 01:21 +0200, Jan Engelhardt wrote:

On Wednesday 2015-05-27 21:24, Dominique Leuenberger / DimStar wrote:

...

On Wed, 2015-05-27 at 22:18 +0300, Andrei Dziahel wrote:

...

Hey list

2015-05-27 22:10 GMT+03:00 Ludwig Nussel :

...

==== exo-lang ==== Version update (0.10.4 -> 0.10.6) Subpackages: exo-tools libexo-1-0

shouldn't exo-lang be a subpackage of libexo?

All those packages are all built from the same .spec file... the bot has to guess any name as the 'main' package (IIRC, it takes them alphabetically). In this case especially, there is no package created with the same name as the .spec file (.spec being called exo... any guess as good as any other)

But the .spec basename (better: the Name: field in the .spec) *is* a better guess than what it guesses currently.

Just that in this case, there is no binary package produced with $(basename). But I'm sure Ludwig gladly takes pull requests against https://github.com/openSUSE/osc-plugin-factory/tree/master/factory -package-news into consideration. -- Dimstar / Dominique Leuenberger