[opensuse-factory] New Tumbleweed snapshot 20150526 released!
Changed packages: ==== ctags ==== - Fix endless loop in javascript parser (bnc#899486, CVE-2014-7204) - Added CVE-2014-7204.patch ==== exo-lang ==== Version update (0.10.4 -> 0.10.6) Subpackages: exo-tools libexo-1-0 - update to version 0.10.6 - Close fd with error state goto (CID 30797), extension of previous fix "File descriptor was never opened if < 0 (CID #85387)" - update to version 0.10.5 - Added --disable-debug to distcheck rules, this will allow building with autogen.sh --disable-debug on newer systems (bxo#11556) - Do not use x-scheme-handler/file mimetype (bxo#7257) - Escape URIs for exo-open (bxo#9912) - File descriptor was never opened if < 0 (CID #85387) - Reverted patches that broke window focus on startup (bxo#11743) - Fix StartupNotify (bxo#9570) - Fix implicit declaration of function 'xfce_spawn_on_screen' (bxo#11655) - Translation updates ==== gawk ==== Version update (4.1.2 -> 4.1.3) - GNU awk 4.1.3: * Regexp parsing with extra brackets should now be working again. * Updated to latest config.guess and config.sub. * bug fixes ==== yast2 ==== Version update (3.1.124 -> 3.1.125) Subpackages: yast2-devel-doc - Fixed proposal to open fallback ports for services (bsc#916376) - Removed opening iSCSI ports from firewall proposal (bsc#916376) - 3.1.125 Removed packages: Added packages: -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-factory+unsubscribe@opensuse.org To contact the owner, e-mail: opensuse-factory+owner@opensuse.org
Hey list 2015-05-27 22:10 GMT+03:00 Ludwig Nussel <ludwig.nussel@suse.de>:
==== exo-lang ==== Version update (0.10.4 -> 0.10.6) Subpackages: exo-tools libexo-1-0
shouldn't exo-lang be a subpackage of libexo? -- Regards, Andrei Dziahel -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-factory+unsubscribe@opensuse.org To contact the owner, e-mail: opensuse-factory+owner@opensuse.org
On Wed, 2015-05-27 at 22:18 +0300, Andrei Dziahel wrote:
Hey list
2015-05-27 22:10 GMT+03:00 Ludwig Nussel <ludwig.nussel@suse.de>:
==== exo-lang ==== Version update (0.10.4 -> 0.10.6) Subpackages: exo-tools libexo-1-0
shouldn't exo-lang be a subpackage of libexo?
All those packages are all built from the same .spec file... the bot has to guess any name as the 'main' package (IIRC, it takes them alphabetically). In this case especially, there is no package created with the same name as the .spec file (.spec being called exo... any guess as good as any other) Hth, Dominique -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-factory+unsubscribe@opensuse.org To contact the owner, e-mail: opensuse-factory+owner@opensuse.org
On Wednesday 2015-05-27 21:24, Dominique Leuenberger / DimStar wrote:
On Wed, 2015-05-27 at 22:18 +0300, Andrei Dziahel wrote:
Hey list
2015-05-27 22:10 GMT+03:00 Ludwig Nussel <ludwig.nussel@suse.de>:
==== exo-lang ==== Version update (0.10.4 -> 0.10.6) Subpackages: exo-tools libexo-1-0
shouldn't exo-lang be a subpackage of libexo?
All those packages are all built from the same .spec file... the bot has to guess any name as the 'main' package (IIRC, it takes them alphabetically). In this case especially, there is no package created with the same name as the .spec file (.spec being called exo... any guess as good as any other)
But the .spec basename (better: the Name: field in the .spec) *is* a better guess than what it guesses currently. -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-factory+unsubscribe@opensuse.org To contact the owner, e-mail: opensuse-factory+owner@opensuse.org
Jan Engelhardt <jengelh@inai.de> writes:
On Wednesday 2015-05-27 21:24, Dominique Leuenberger / DimStar wrote:
On Wed, 2015-05-27 at 22:18 +0300, Andrei Dziahel wrote:
Hey list
2015-05-27 22:10 GMT+03:00 Ludwig Nussel <ludwig.nussel@suse.de>:
==== exo-lang ==== Version update (0.10.4 -> 0.10.6) Subpackages: exo-tools libexo-1-0
shouldn't exo-lang be a subpackage of libexo?
All those packages are all built from the same .spec file... the bot has to guess any name as the 'main' package (IIRC, it takes them alphabetically). In this case especially, there is no package created with the same name as the .spec file (.spec being called exo... any guess as good as any other)
But the .spec basename (better: the Name: field in the .spec) *is* a better guess than what it guesses currently.
Or rpm -q --qf=${SOURCERPM}. Andreas. -- Andreas Schwab, SUSE Labs, schwab@suse.de GPG Key fingerprint = 0196 BAD8 1CE9 1970 F4BE 1748 E4D4 88E3 0EEA B9D7 "And now for something completely different." -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-factory+unsubscribe@opensuse.org To contact the owner, e-mail: opensuse-factory+owner@opensuse.org
On Thu, 2015-05-28 at 01:21 +0200, Jan Engelhardt wrote:
On Wednesday 2015-05-27 21:24, Dominique Leuenberger / DimStar wrote:
On Wed, 2015-05-27 at 22:18 +0300, Andrei Dziahel wrote:
Hey list
2015-05-27 22:10 GMT+03:00 Ludwig Nussel <ludwig.nussel@suse.de>:
==== exo-lang ==== Version update (0.10.4 -> 0.10.6) Subpackages: exo-tools libexo-1-0
shouldn't exo-lang be a subpackage of libexo?
All those packages are all built from the same .spec file... the bot has to guess any name as the 'main' package (IIRC, it takes them alphabetically). In this case especially, there is no package created with the same name as the .spec file (.spec being called exo... any guess as good as any other)
But the .spec basename (better: the Name: field in the .spec) *is* a better guess than what it guesses currently.
Just that in this case, there is no binary package produced with $(basename). But I'm sure Ludwig gladly takes pull requests against https://github.com/openSUSE/osc-plugin-factory/tree/master/factory -package-news into consideration. -- Dimstar / Dominique Leuenberger <dimstar@opensuse.org>
participants (6)
-
Andreas Schwab -
Andrei Dziahel -
Dimstar / Dominique Leuenberger -
Dominique Leuenberger / DimStar
-
Jan Engelhardt -
Ludwig Nussel