[opensuse-factory] suse_version 1230 on openSUSE 13.1
Hi all, on openSUSE 13.1, both 32 and 64bits x86 distro, suse_version is reported as 1230 : rpm --eval "%{suse_version}" 1230 Is it a bug or expected ? Cheers -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-factory+unsubscribe@opensuse.org To contact the owner, e-mail: opensuse-factory+owner@opensuse.org
More on this : It seems defined in /usr/lib/rpm/suse_macros ... # find-supplements.ksyms parses this macro directly out of the spec file: %supplements_kernel_module() \ %{expand:%(if ! rpm -q kernel-syms > /dev/null; then echo "%fail Please add the kernel-syms package to BuildRequires"; fi)} %suse_version 1230 %sles_version 0 %ul_version 0 .... 2013/11/27 Henri Gomez <henri.gomez@gmail.com>:
Hi all,
on openSUSE 13.1, both 32 and 64bits x86 distro, suse_version is reported as 1230 :
rpm --eval "%{suse_version}" 1230
Is it a bug or expected ?
Cheers -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-factory+unsubscribe@opensuse.org To contact the owner, e-mail: opensuse-factory+owner@opensuse.org
Hi, I can confirm that. I opened https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=852546 for you. Ciao, Marcus On Wed, Nov 27, 2013 at 10:49:27AM +0100, Henri Gomez wrote:
It seems defined in /usr/lib/rpm/suse_macros
... # find-supplements.ksyms parses this macro directly out of the spec file: %supplements_kernel_module() \ %{expand:%(if ! rpm -q kernel-syms > /dev/null; then echo "%fail Please add the kernel-syms package to BuildRequires"; fi)}
%suse_version 1230 %sles_version 0 %ul_version 0 ....
2013/11/27 Henri Gomez <henri.gomez@gmail.com>:
Hi all,
on openSUSE 13.1, both 32 and 64bits x86 distro, suse_version is reported as 1230 :
rpm --eval "%{suse_version}" 1230
Is it a bug or expected ?
Cheers -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-factory+unsubscribe@opensuse.org To contact the owner, e-mail: opensuse-factory+owner@opensuse.org
-- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-factory+unsubscribe@opensuse.org To contact the owner, e-mail: opensuse-factory+owner@opensuse.org
Thanks. For now, I updated file manually :) 2013/11/27 Marcus Meissner <meissner@suse.de>:
Hi,
I can confirm that.
I opened https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=852546 for you.
Ciao, Marcus On Wed, Nov 27, 2013 at 10:49:27AM +0100, Henri Gomez wrote:
It seems defined in /usr/lib/rpm/suse_macros
... # find-supplements.ksyms parses this macro directly out of the spec file: %supplements_kernel_module() \ %{expand:%(if ! rpm -q kernel-syms > /dev/null; then echo "%fail Please add the kernel-syms package to BuildRequires"; fi)}
%suse_version 1230 %sles_version 0 %ul_version 0 ....
2013/11/27 Henri Gomez <henri.gomez@gmail.com>:
Hi all,
on openSUSE 13.1, both 32 and 64bits x86 distro, suse_version is reported as 1230 :
rpm --eval "%{suse_version}" 1230
Is it a bug or expected ?
Cheers -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-factory+unsubscribe@opensuse.org To contact the owner, e-mail: opensuse-factory+owner@opensuse.org
-- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-factory+unsubscribe@opensuse.org To contact the owner, e-mail: opensuse-factory+owner@opensuse.org
On 27.11.2013 10:45, Henri Gomez wrote:
Hi all,
on openSUSE 13.1, both 32 and 64bits x86 distro, suse_version is reported as 1230 :
rpm --eval "%{suse_version}" 1230
Is it a bug or expected ?
It's bug 851877 Gruß, Stephan -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-factory+unsubscribe@opensuse.org To contact the owner, e-mail: opensuse-factory+owner@opensuse.org
Hello, Am Mittwoch, 27. November 2013 schrieb Stephan Kulow:
On 27.11.2013 10:45, Henri Gomez wrote:
on openSUSE 13.1, both 32 and 64bits x86 distro, suse_version is reported as 1230 :
rpm --eval "%{suse_version}" 1230
It's bug 851877
I just submitted a fix (SR208678) to Base:System/rpm, including a check that makes sure this doesn't happen again in future versions: grep "^%%suse_version $(source /etc/os-release ; echo ${VERSION_ID/./})0" %{SOURCE4} Build failures are much easier to detect than outdated version numbers in a file ;-) Regards, Christian Boltz PS: non-random sig ;-) -- There is nothing wrong with making mistakes, but... make *new* ones. [D.Sim] -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-factory+unsubscribe@opensuse.org To contact the owner, e-mail: opensuse-factory+owner@opensuse.org
On 27.11.2013 14:18, Christian Boltz wrote:
Hello,
Am Mittwoch, 27. November 2013 schrieb Stephan Kulow:
On 27.11.2013 10:45, Henri Gomez wrote:
on openSUSE 13.1, both 32 and 64bits x86 distro, suse_version is reported as 1230 :
rpm --eval "%{suse_version}" 1230
It's bug 851877
I just submitted a fix (SR208678) to Base:System/rpm, including a check that makes sure this doesn't happen again in future versions:
grep "^%%suse_version $(source /etc/os-release ; echo ${VERSION_ID/./})0" %{SOURCE4}
Build failures are much easier to detect than outdated version numbers in a file ;-)
You just created a monster of a build cycle. rpm is one of the core-core-core packages and you can't just go and take packages from the very top and build against it. Greetings, Stephan -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-factory+unsubscribe@opensuse.org To contact the owner, e-mail: opensuse-factory+owner@opensuse.org
Hello, Am Mittwoch, 27. November 2013 schrieb Stephan Kulow:
On 27.11.2013 14:18, Christian Boltz wrote:
I just submitted a fix (SR208678) to Base:System/rpm, including a check> that makes sure this doesn't happen again in future versions: grep "^%%suse_version $(source /etc/os-release ; echo ${VERSION_ID/./})0" %{SOURCE4}> Build failures are much easier to detect than outdated version numbers in a file ;-)
You just created a monster of a build cycle. rpm is one of the core-core-core packages and you can't just go and take packages from the very top and build against it.
Oh, nice. I already wondered because it was too easy to add the check ;-) (and I have to admit that I didn't consider build cycles when I added it) Anyway, Michael already declined my SR, so we'll have to wait until someone implements the method he proposed. I hope this someone does it before we see the same problem in 13.2 ;-) Regards, Christian Boltz -- Get back there in front of the computer NOW. Christmas can wait. [Linus "the Grinch" Torvalds, 24 Dec 2000 on linux-kernel] -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-factory+unsubscribe@opensuse.org To contact the owner, e-mail: opensuse-factory+owner@opensuse.org
Christian Boltz <opensuse@cboltz.de> writes:
Anyway, Michael already declined my SR, so we'll have to wait until someone implements the method he proposed. I hope this someone does it before we see the same problem in 13.2 ;-)
In the old days it came from /etc/rpm/suse_macros which was injected by autobuild. Andreas. -- Andreas Schwab, SUSE Labs, schwab@suse.de GPG Key fingerprint = 0196 BAD8 1CE9 1970 F4BE 1748 E4D4 88E3 0EEA B9D7 "And now for something completely different." -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-factory+unsubscribe@opensuse.org To contact the owner, e-mail: opensuse-factory+owner@opensuse.org
On Wed, Nov 27, 2013 at 02:18:24PM +0100, Christian Boltz wrote:
Hello,
Am Mittwoch, 27. November 2013 schrieb Stephan Kulow:
On 27.11.2013 10:45, Henri Gomez wrote:
on openSUSE 13.1, both 32 and 64bits x86 distro, suse_version is reported as 1230 :
rpm --eval "%{suse_version}" 1230
It's bug 851877
I just submitted a fix (SR208678) to Base:System/rpm, including a check that makes sure this doesn't happen again in future versions:
grep "^%%suse_version $(source /etc/os-release ; echo ${VERSION_ID/./})0" %{SOURCE4}
Build failures are much easier to detect than outdated version numbers in a file ;-)
Maybe, but /etc/os-release comes from the openSUSE-release, which should not be installed for package building. It's much saner to move the definition from rpm to the release package, like I suggested in the bug report. M. -- Michael Schroeder mls@suse.de SUSE LINUX Products GmbH, GF Jeff Hawn, HRB 16746 AG Nuernberg main(_){while(_=~getchar())putchar(~_-1/(~(_|32)/13*2-11)*13);} -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-factory+unsubscribe@opensuse.org To contact the owner, e-mail: opensuse-factory+owner@opensuse.org
participants (6)
-
Andreas Schwab -
Christian Boltz -
Henri Gomez -
Marcus Meissner -
Michael Schroeder -
Stephan Kulow