That solves my issue. Thank you! ~xz -- Xu Zhao i@xuzhao.net On Wed, 19 Feb 2020, at 10:57 PM, Andrei Borzenkov wrote:

20.02.2020 06:45, Xu Zhao пишет:

...

Hello all,

After upgrading to netcfg 11.6 I find it has moved the file /etc/protocols to /usr/etc/protocols. This will break the assumption of some applications and function calls. For example, the getprotobyname() call (https://linux.die.net/man/3/getprotobyname) takes a protocol name and should return a struct protoent. However, on my machine this function call returns NULL. Creating a softlink from "/usr/etc/protocols" to "/etc/protocols" could workaround this problem. However, I believe we should fix it by patching glibc.

https://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-factory/2020-02/msg00025.html -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-factory+unsubscribe@opensuse.org To contact the owner, e-mail: opensuse-factory+owner@opensuse.org

-- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-factory+unsubscribe@opensuse.org To contact the owner, e-mail: opensuse-factory+owner@opensuse.org

On Thu, 2020-02-20 at 10:58 +0100, Joerg Schilling wrote:

Xu Zhao wrote:

...

Creating a softlink from "/usr/etc/protocols" to "/etc/protocols" could workaround this problem. However, I believe we should fix it by patching glibc.

If this means that configurable data is now on /usr, this seems to be a mistake.

It doesn't mean that

/usr should be expected to be on a read-only filesystem.

/usr is read only; that's exactly correct. Once again the link: https://en.opensuse.org/openSUSE:Packaging_UsrEtc Cheers, Dominique -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-factory+unsubscribe@opensuse.org To contact the owner, e-mail: opensuse-factory+owner@opensuse.org