On Wed, 2012-02-01 at 14:30 +0100, Mike Galbraith wrote:
On Wed, 2012-02-01 at 09:04 -0300, Cristian Rodríguez wrote:
On 01/02/12 07:04, Mike Galbraith wrote:
On Wed, 2012-02-01 at 10:10 +0100, Frederic Crozat wrote:
Le mercredi 01 février 2012 à 08:32 +0100, Mike Galbraith a écrit :
Greetings,
Recovering from a completely disasterous update to 12.1, I find that systemd has automated cgroups. This is less than useless to me, I need to turn this stuff off so I can set things up as needed, when needed.
You can't, cgroups are an integral part of systemd.
Incredible. Until now, systemd sounded to me like it might be a step in the right direction. It suddenly sounds utterly vile.
What's the problem with it ? how do you expect systemd to contain processes ?
I expect it to do process containment when and how I says it's ok to do so. It is not at all cool for systemd to do what someone else decides it should do with my processes in my workstation without my consent.
BTW, imagine I posted a patch removing SCHED_AUTOGROUP option, mandating that anyone who has CGROUP_SCHED enabled WILL use automated task groups as the great and powerful me (arrogance personified) defines them. The world would burn little 'ole /me at the stake, and rightfully so. -Mike -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-factory+unsubscribe@opensuse.org To contact the owner, e-mail: opensuse-factory+owner@opensuse.org