data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/68ae7/68ae71edad79ebd237a2efa18fedad9ec6e24ac5" alt=""
PulseAudio has been discused previoulsy in this lists: - http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-factory/2007-11/msg00173.html - http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-packaging/2008-03/msg00051.html It was saw like an ESD replacement for Gnome, but that had nothing to aport to KDE. After all, a sound server is only an extra layer that gives us mixing... and latency. And since we already have mixing though dmix a sound server doesn't makes any sense, true? Well, we were wrong. I would like to reopen the PulseAudio in KDE debate. But this time everybody must read this before: http://0pointer.de/blog/projects/pulse-glitch-free.html Looks like PulseAudio doesn't give us only network transparency. It give us a better sound system, energy saving... and no extra latency. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-factory+unsubscribe@opensuse.org For additional commands, e-mail: opensuse-factory+help@opensuse.org