Hi, last month's status: https://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-factory/2019-05/msg00341.html Last months' reproducible builds project updates (including my work): https://reproducible-builds.org/reports/2019-05/ This month, due to recent rebuilds, the number of verified packages grew so much that I could check that currently all verifiable Tumbleweed binaries contain what they should. Not verified are: 1: 348+ packages known to not build reproducibly 2: 16 efi and kmp packages - mostly because https://github.com/openSUSE/pesign-obs-integration/pull/14 was reverted 3: ~80 packages using _multibuild without empty FLAVOR (needs work in my tooling) 4: ~5 packages with unsubmitted local fixes - that number shrunk a lot last month The other caveat here is that this is using build-compare and that already had 3 bugs that caused it to report different rpms as identical. To avoid the possibility of such bugs in the future, I'd like to see bit-identical verifiable rpms for Leap 16. This is tracked in https://bugzilla.opensuse.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1133809 Newly reproducible core packages: acl https://build.opensuse.org/request/show/705693 gnome-documents had unreproducible pdf from inkscape - file was dropped gcc8 only reproducible when building with %do_profiling 0 That is not the default in Factory to gain 8% compiler performance. note: gcc9 is similar. libqt5-qttools maybe from rcc toolchain fixes? or maybe there are still low-entropy order issues in rcc output python-marshmallow https://build.opensuse.org/request/show/705891 Still unreproducible: MozillaFirefox+Thunderbird filed http://bugzilla.opensuse.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1137970 I uploaded https://rb.zq1.de/compare.factory-20190626/ today and rbstats (with comparison to last month) are: total-packages: 12014 (+103) build-tried: 12004 (+95) build-failed: 48 (-5) build-n-a: 106 (-5) build-succeeded: 11850 (+105) build-official-failed+na: 173 (-9) build-compare-failed: 348 (+10) build-compare-succeeded: 11502 (+95) verify-failed: 531 (-1184) verified-semi-reproducible: 11246 (+1309) verified-bit-identical: 0 (+0) bit-by-bit-identical: 11189 (+84) not-bit-by-bit-identical: 651 (+15) https://rb.zq1.de/compare.factory-20190626/graph.png shows the change over time https://rb.zq1.de/compare.factory-20190626/unreproduciblerings.txt lists very unreproducible core packages (bootstrap+DVD) Of the badly unreproducible packages, 3 were in ring0 39 were in ring1 That makes it 42/2901 => 1.45 % which is below the overall average of 348/11850 => 2.94 % 651/11850 => 5.49 % of packages are not perfectly reproducible Ciao Bernhard M.