2012/2/7 Ruediger Meier
On Tuesday 07 February 2012, Hubert Mantel wrote:
Dear god,
On Tue, Feb 07, Cristian Rodríguez wrote:
On 06/02/12 21:45, Brian K. White wrote:
Tech problem 1: A system based on scripts is infinitely more flexible, transparent, debugable, than a system based on a binary compiled c program. That has uncountable value and I want that. And bonus, we already have it. Why throw it away?
sysvinit is also a binary compiled C program.
Great, irrefutable argument.
Applause... Bash is also written in C. A script is still no C program. The point was that systemd does a lot more magic that just executing scripts (or well known binaries). Inflexible, intransparent, hard to debug for the enduser.
This depends on what you dub as 'enduser'. A real enduser has no SysV init knowledge to debug, not even about shell scripting, while a traditional linux user __might__ have. So it also isn't much of an argument.
Personal problem: The people behind systemd refuse to acknowledge the technical problems and refuse to either solve them or entertain someone else solving them.
have you considered that may be because it is absolute non-sense ?
Thanks for confirmation.
Hubert Mantel -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-factory+unsubscribe@opensuse.org To contact the owner, e-mail: opensuse-factory+owner@opensuse.org
-- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-factory+unsubscribe@opensuse.org To contact the owner, e-mail: opensuse-factory+owner@opensuse.org