Hello, Am Samstag, 18. August 2012 schrieb Felix Miata:
On 2012/08/17 22:51 (GMT+0200) Christian Boltz composed:
Felix Miata composed: [zypper dup wants to drop in several 32bit packages] That's a general answer for everybody running "zypper dup".
I don't sense that's a sensible answer on this mailing list. On any release-next prior to version freeze, I expect only dup to do what's needed, so I'm in the habit of using dup for the duration of any release-next. What might I be misunderstanding about the difference between dup and up?
dup updates more aggressive and does some things that up doesn't: - vendor/repo changes - arch changes Yes, usually[tm] dup is the recommended way for upgrading your system, but if you see some strange things (like installing 32bit packages on a 64bit system), stay on the safe side and use only up. I hope this answers your question - if not, ask ;-)
The only thing I can say about the KDE 4.9 repo is that is has lots of packages that are still building or scheduled for build, which means: wait ;-) (It might take some time, the OBS monitor says there are about 10000 packages for each arch in the queue.)
On Bob's system I needed 4.9 due to https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=305161 which unfortunately doesn't go far enough.
In the meantime, the KDE49 repo has completely been build and published: https://build.opensuse.org/project/monitor?project=KDE%3ARelease%3A49 Try zypper dup (yes, dup) again ;-) Regards, Christian Boltz -- Meinem Gefühl nach hat beim systemd SuSE die Bananenpolitik perfektioniert - nicht mal die Bananen reifen beim Kunden sondern die Samen für die Pflanzen wurden verteilt [Manfred Kreisl in opensuse-de] -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-factory+unsubscribe@opensuse.org To contact the owner, e-mail: opensuse-factory+owner@opensuse.org