On Mon, Oct 26, 2015 at 04:06:36PM +0100, Jan Engelhardt wrote:
On Monday 2015-10-26 15:48, Dr. Werner Fink wrote:
On Mon, Oct 26, 2015 at 02:50:53PM +0100, Jan Engelhardt wrote:
On Monday 2015-10-26 14:23, Dr. Werner Fink wrote:
On Mon, Oct 26, 2015 at 12:54:05PM +0100, Andreas Schwab wrote:
"Dr. Werner Fink"
writes: osc build --root /abuild/oscbuild/openSUSE_13.1 openSUSE_13.1 systemd.spec osc build --root /abuild/oscbuild/openSUSE_13.2 openSUSE_13.2 systemd.spec
do not exit ...
As expected.
Obviously, %is_opensuse is for leap & tw. classic_opensuse (%suse_version <= 1320 && %suse_version != 1315) is not touched.
Then %is_opensuse is not a replacement for %suse_version == 1315
%if 0%{?suse_version} == 1315 && !0%{?is_opensuse} /* SLE12 */ eth* %else enp* %endif
1315 is not used for *any* openSUSE product but *only* for SLES-12 based products. And the core of Leap is SLES-12 based AFAIU ;P Therefore I'd like to know what the users say about the network schemes. *Is* there a majority of the users which indeed prefere to use the predictable networl naming. I had already post a ballot paper and I'd like to see some results. Werner -- "Having a smoking section in a restaurant is like having a peeing section in a swimming pool." -- Edward Burr