It's just postponing the "problem". :-)
For me it rather seems to "offer a solution if there is a problem". In an ideal world, there is no problem to solve, in the other ones we will provide a possibility to correct what was wrong.
BTW: there is still a solution if an automatic proposal fails: Installation can still check what has failed and offer user manual tuning in that case (at the end of the first stage).
Now I'm confused. Let's try to explain :-) If the installer will allow the user to tune everything at the end of the first stage in case something "goes wrong", I don't see the improvement. It's just before the reboot instead then after. I also wonder how you can check that things like printer, network, tv card work before you have a complete installation, so I don't understand how you can "check" what failed. To add some consideration, I think that the idea of cleaning up the installation process, which was considered too long, and not too complex by users, at least in my experience on IRC, is good. But it seems to me that the proposed solutions add complexity instead of removing it, by just moving configuration options to a more hidden location or postponing the configuration. Anyway, I hope to see the new version in action in alpha 3, so we can talk again after a test :-) With kind regards, Alberto --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-factory+unsubscribe@opensuse.org For additional commands, e-mail: opensuse-factory+help@opensuse.org