20 Feb
2017
20 Feb
'17
09:57
On Mon, 2017-02-20 at 10:42 +0100, Bruno Friedmann wrote:
Thanks this is the explanation, and what I mean by improving our rings/test/ release process. We now discover that sip is a good candidate to be included in ring no?
What qualifies python3-sip to be in the ring? The rings are by definition the things needed for the default installs for GNOME and KDE - so the things that you can find on the DVD. This seems to still be working - so the ring protected exactly what it was supposed to protect. I'm sure 'somebody' can make an argument for 'every package' to be in a ring - because he uses this package (FTR: my machine does not contain python3-sip) Cheers, Dominique