On Sun, 11 Sep 2011 16:15:50 +0530, todd rme <toddrme2178@gmail.com> wrote:
Isn't that the whole point of packman, to deliver packages that violate openSUSE policies? Why can't that argument be made for all the other packages in packman?
with most of the other packages it's legal problems that exile them into packman; no point discussing those. they're either legal, or they aren't. in this case it's another rule that isn't necessarily so hard & fast: religious content is banned. obviously because it would lead to long, heated, pointless discussions like this one. i think that isn't a prerogative of religious content. KDE4/3, GNOME3, and many other topics come to mind that inspire similar or worse emotional outbursts. i think -- and i'm aware of how important my thoughts are, as non-contributor -- that the only criteria for inclusion should be technical & legal. if people want to use it, it should be possible to add it. not necessarily to core or factory, but somewhere. in any case, i can live with whatever "the community" decides on this. and once decided, it makes sense to stick to it, of course. -- phani. -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-factory+unsubscribe@opensuse.org For additional commands, e-mail: opensuse-factory+help@opensuse.org