Hi, last month's status: https://lists.opensuse.org/archives/list/factory@lists.opensuse.org/message/... Last months' reproducible builds project updates (including my work): https://reproducible-builds.org/reports/2021-06/ Not much exciting happened this month. I'm still seeing and reporting many unreliable builds, especially in python modules. I uploaded https://rb.zq1.de/compare.factory-20210730/ today and rbstats are: total-packages: 14070 (-12) build-tried: 14042 (-11) build-failed: 36 (+3) build-n-a: 198 (+35) build-succeeded: 13808 (-49) build-official-failed+na: 29 (-219) build-compare-failed: 372 (+13) build-compare-succeeded: 13436 (-62) verify-failed: 481 (+6) verified-semi-reproducible: 13096 (+17) bit-by-bit-identical: 13161 (-45) not-bit-by-bit-identical: 637 (-3) https://rb.zq1.de/compare.factory-20210730/graph.png shows the change over time https://rb.zq1.de/compare.factory-20210730/unreproduciblerings.txt lists very unreproducible core packages (bootstrap+DVD) Of the badly unreproducible packages, 3 were in ring0 43 were in ring1 That makes it 46/3247 => 1.42 % which is below the overall average of 372/13808 => 2.69 % 637/13808 => 4.61 % of packages are not perfectly reproducible Ciao Bernhard M.