last month's status: https://email@example.com/thread/I...
Last months' reproducible builds project updates (including my work): https://reproducible-builds.org/reports/2021-05/
This month we improved reproducibility of our kernel packages via https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1187167 though I still need to test the fix for the embedded random signing key.
Most of the bugreports and fixes I did this month are about being able to build in the year 2036 and with -j1
https://bugzilla.opensuse.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1185637 could still use some love in that area. I tried to extend the certs, but for some reason this did not make tests pass.
Additionally, I pushed several fixes towards 15.3
I uploaded https://rb.zq1.de/compare.factory-20210630/ today and rbstats are: total-packages: 14082 (+56) build-tried: 14053 (+64) build-failed: 33 (-25) build-n-a: 163 (-1) build-succeeded: 13857 (+90) build-official-failed+na: 248 (-150) build-compare-failed: 359 (-6) build-compare-succeeded: 13498 (+96) verify-failed: 475 (+7) verified-semi-reproducible: 13079 (+491) bit-by-bit-identical: 13206 (+80) not-bit-by-bit-identical: 640 (-1)
https://rb.zq1.de/compare.factory-20210630/graph.png shows the change over time
https://rb.zq1.de/compare.factory-20210630/unreproduciblerings.txt lists very unreproducible core packages (bootstrap+DVD)
Of the badly unreproducible packages, 3 were in ring0 41 were in ring1
That makes it 44/3247 => 1.36 % which is below the overall average of 359/13857 => 2.59 %
640/13857 => 4.62 % of packages are not perfectly reproducible
Ciao Bernhard M.