On 2/6/2012 10:51 PM, Cristian Rodríguez wrote:
On 06/02/12 21:45, Brian K. White wrote:
Tech problem 1: A system based on scripts is infinitely more flexible, transparent, debugable, than a system based on a binary compiled c program. That has uncountable value and I want that. And bonus, we already have it. Why throw it away?
sysvinit is also a binary compiled C program.
...which does very little besides run sh (another compiled c program) which runs the scripts. It's idiotic "arguments" like that that result in the personal attacks. If the unit files were fully expressive scripts instead of config files there would be a little less argument. Then the complaint would be merely: "Why in the world do I want to use some brand new baby scripting language which will take years to develop into parity with any of the many already existing mature scripting languages, and even then, what was the advantage that was so worth all the work when everyone _already_ knows shell and the countless decades of scripts are _already_ written in it?" That's still a pretty hard to answer question but at least systemd wouldn't be actually making some stuff impossible by changing the basic paradigm and providing no mechanism for processes that don't happen to fit.
Personal problem: The people behind systemd refuse to acknowledge the technical problems and refuse to either solve them or entertain someone else solving them.
have you considered that may be because it is absolute non-sense ?
btw.. lxc containers should work just fine with libvirt..
They should, and someday they might, but they don't. Why do you talk about things you don't know about? -- bkw -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-factory+unsubscribe@opensuse.org To contact the owner, e-mail: opensuse-factory+owner@opensuse.org