Rajko M a écrit :
Complains here are about Reply To field, but the list server configuration is actually the problem.
Rjko, you are actually highjacking a thread :-) There is a very long thread on an other list on this very subject :-) but let's try to find an answer :-)
With present configuration where private addresses are sent out with mails to all subscribers
this is mandatory in the RFC for mails. if not the mail would be anonymous, not a good practice the archives are an other problem. Henne, if you read this, one thing that can be done and is done on my LUG http://www.culte.org/listes/archivage.html two things are proposed: * use of an "X-No-Archive: yes" header that makes your mail not to be archived at all * Its possible on this list to ask to have the adress masked (in the archives only) by a mail to the list server. I don't know of the system used, but I could give you privately the mail of the list owner, a very brilliant Linux practician (Eric Marsden). jdd -- http://www.dodin.net http://dodin.org/galerie_photo_web/expo/index.html http://lucien.dodin.net http://fr.susewiki.org/index.php?title=Gérer_ses_photos