On Wednesday 03 February 2016, Johannes Meixner wrote:
Hello,
On Feb 3 11:53 Wolfgang Rosenauer wrote (excerpt):
... I'm not sure if we should have a pretty strict rule to give at least a bit of time to the maintainer even if they look really simple. There could be several reasons which cannot be known by project maintainers for example. Another solution could be to have a really easy and quick to use "revert" feature in the webui
I think in general it is bad when a project maintainer ignores explicitly specified package maintainers.
If there exists one or more explicitly specified package maintainers, then anyone else should normally leave any issue for the explicit package maintainers decision up to a reasonable waiting time.
In the other mail thread there was a proposal that the default waiting time should be one week.
I think this makes sense.
Sometimes it's annoying to wait that long. I guess this is the only reason why we have so many project maintainers sitting in any project at all. Another idea might be that one package maintainer could accept immediately but it would need at least 2 or 3 project maintainers to accept. If the package maintainer is sr'ing himself then one project maintainer might be enough to accept. Then ... after one week silence ... anybody of the project maintainers can accept alone. BTW what I really don't like is that a maintainer can just commit without branching/sr'ing at all. Some people just commit (even without any commit message) and they would never sr at all. That's the most annoying thing. You don't even get a message that somebody did something. And last but not least ... the submitter should not be allowed to accept his own request accept he _owns_ the project (e.g. his own home:USER). cu, Rudi -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-factory+unsubscribe@opensuse.org To contact the owner, e-mail: opensuse-factory+owner@opensuse.org