On 2008/09/26 15:58 (GMT+0200) Henne Vogelsang composed:
On Friday, September 26, 2008 at 09:55:06, Felix Miata wrote:
On 2008/09/26 04:26 (GMT-0600) bugzilla_noreply@novell.com composed:
User jreidinger@novell.com added comment https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=224476#c27
--- Comment #27 from Josef Reidinger
2008-09-26 04:26:06 MDT --- Created an attachment (id=241908) --> (https://bugzilla.novell.com/attachment.cgi?id=241908) patch for update-bootloader
this do something as your skip, only you must set none to LOADER_TYPE
I tried to reply in this bug, but the bug page is defective in both Firefox 2.0.0.17, FF 3.0.2, Epiphany, Opera & Konq on 10.2, and in SeaMonkey 1.1.12 on OS/2. It shows the new attachment, but it fails to show comment #27, all whether logged in or not.
Those comments are marked private. The last comment is:
Last comment where?
mistake, this should go to another bug
So nothing wrong with it :)
You have much confused me by your reply. What should go to another bug? 1-your reply to my post? and/or, 2-the attachment Josef added to bug 224476? and/or, 3-the comment 27 shown in the bugmail? I think a bug that is not private should not be allowed to have a comment marked private. A bug should be 100% private or 100% not-private, not some kind of mix. -- "Unless the Lord builds the house, its builders labor in vain." Psalm 127:1 NIV Team OS/2 ** Reg. Linux User #211409 Felix Miata *** http://fm.no-ip.com/ -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-factory+unsubscribe@opensuse.org For additional commands, e-mail: opensuse-factory+help@opensuse.org