On Sat, Dec 17, 2011 at 1:11 PM, Cristian Rodríguez firstname.lastname@example.org wrote:
On 17/12/11 14:51, Greg Freemyer wrote:
A goal of eliminating the package sysvinit and the associated run levels is one thing.
Yes, but *after* providing all missing systemd native units.
Excuse my terminology since I don't know systemd, but...
My understanding is a systemd unit file can simply provide a path to a /etc/init.d script and thus systemd compatibility is achieved without the use of a FULLY native systemd unit file.
As I read your plan, it assumes a goal of not using that approach for any of the services.
Again, I don't know enough to argue for or against a goal of FULLY native systemd unit files. That is why I'm saying a separate discussion of that goal should take place before arguing the merits of your plan.