On Friday 30 September 2011 02:53:06 Sascha Peilicke wrote:
What they "have" I don't care about, I care what they maintain. You know, I'm the guy who WONTFIXed a guessed value of quatro trillion thousand KDE bugs because they don't apply to KDE4. So I don't want KDE:KDE3 in factory, I agreed to have a KDE3 desktop. I don't see why we need to have all the koffice1 bugs back.
On top of that, you say you're not using factory - so you're doing a complete wild shot in submitting all these 2008 spec files. To summarize: limit yourself to a basic desktop you can **maintain** together with the Trinity guy.
Until these and the issues I mentioned are sorted out, I'm against submitting any further KDE3 packages. Therefore, I declined those that are currently open (for the reasons mentioned).
How would you like this sorted out? For example, sim-im is mainatained here: http://svn.berlios.de/wsvn/sim-im
And not in Trinity. I want you to send a mail to this very list evaluating the value of the
Am Donnerstag, 29. September 2011 schrieb Ilya Chernykh: package in distribution and what are the advantages of having kde3-koffice vs. using koffice2 in kde3. Because the downsides are obvious: for example there is no upstream community that won't give a shrug if a user used koffice1. Greetings, Stephan -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-factory+unsubscribe@opensuse.org For additional commands, e-mail: opensuse-factory+help@opensuse.org