On Sunday 13 November 2011, Michal Kubecek wrote:
On the other hand, I criticized zmd in 10.1, I criticized having KDE4 as default when it was far from ready and I do criticize having systemd now because it is about as ready as KDE4 was when it first appeared in OpenSuSE.
The thing is that zmd, kde4 or other mistakes were easily to ignore but the systemd thing is even worse seeing all these patches and dependencies against formerly stable packages.
It is buggy, it is poorly documented, configuration is much more complicated, it makes diagnostic of the boot process harder.What does it give me? A bit faster boot (or maybe only makes it look faster).
Yup, personally I have no use case where boot time matters. The time I need to fix a non booting system matters. And that's why I want to stick with init shell scripts instead of systemd binary black box even if systemd would be stable. cu, Rudi -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-factory+unsubscribe@opensuse.org To contact the owner, e-mail: opensuse-factory+owner@opensuse.org